Jump to content

Page:1902 Encyclopædia Britannica - Volume 25 - A-AUS.pdf/351

From Wikisource
This page needs to be proofread.

ALGEBRAIC Observe that, if there be more than two binary forms, the weight of the simplest perpetuant of degrees 0, 0, 0",...is 20+0+0+..-1-1, as can be seen by reasoning of a similar kind. To obtain information concerning the actual forms of the per- petuants, write where (1+0)(1+0)...(1+σx)=1+A₁x+Ax² + ... + Ax (1+1)(1+T)...(1+7)=1+ B+ B+ ... + B A₁+ B₁=0. For the case =1, 0=1, the condition is 071=AB=0, which, since A₁+ B₁ =0, is really a condition of weight unity. For w 1 the form is Aya + B₁b, which we may write ab₁-abo ao(1) (1)abo; the remaining perpetuants, enumerated by have been set forth above. 2 1-2' For the case 0-1, 0=2, the condition is ₁₁ = A₁B₁₂ = 0; and the simplest perpetuant, derived directly from the product AB is (1)(2)-(21); the remainder of those enumerated by 1-2.1-2 may be represented by the form (1+1)(2+1)-(11) (2+11)+... ±(2+11+1); λ and μ₂ each assuming all integer (including zero) values. For the case 0=0'-2, the condition is +++) (+) = -A3B,B,- A₁A,B=0. To represent the simplest perpetuant, of weight 7, we may take as base either AB,B2 or A₁A,B2, and since A₁+B₁ = 0 the former is equivalent to A,AB, and the latter to A,B,B; so that we have, apparently, a choice of four products. A B₁B, gives (2)(21) (21)(2), and AAB, (21)(2)(2)(21); these two merely differ in sign; and similarly A,B,B2 yields (2) (221), - (21)(22), and that due to A,A,B merely differs from it in sign. We will choose from the forms in such manner that the product of letters A is either a power of A₁, or does not contain A₁; this rule leaves us with AB,B, and A,B,B2; of these forms we will choose that one which in letters B is earliest in ascending die- tionary order; this is AB,B, and our earliest perpetuant is (2)(21), (221)a(2), - and thence the general form enumerated by the generating function 27 (1-2)(1-2) is (2+2)(2+114+1)-(2+21) (2μ₂+11 μ₁)+... ±(2+11+1)(2+1). For the case 0=1, 0'=3 the condition is (+1)₁+72)(01+73)=A,B+AB,B=0. By the rules adopted we take AB,B,, which gives (12)a(32) (1)a(321) + a(3212), FORMS 307 Selecting the product AB,B,B, we find the simplest per- petuant +a(432214), (14) a (4322)-(13)(43221)+(12) a (432212), -(1)a(432213) and thence the general form (1+4)+13+12+2) - ... ±α (4+1 3+1+2+4) due to the generating function 215 1-2.1-2.1-23.1-4. 101 The series may be continued, but the calculations soon become very laborious. Three Binary Forms.-Taking the partial degrees of a sem- invariant of three binary forms to be 0, 0, 0", an easy generaliza- tion of the foregoing leads to the generating function 1 (1-1-2)... (1-01-21-2)... (1-20X1-x1-2)... (1-20")' of the asyzygetic forms. If we place as numerator to this fraction 20+0+0"-1-1 we obtain the generator of the perpetu- ants. To obtain representative forms of perpetuants we require a general solution of the partial differential equation +α 1db₂ or say dodar d d +... bodby +b₁₂ +... .). dobą d codes + d +... ..) = 0, Pa+R+c=0. The general form of solution of +=0 we have seen to be (230) (12233...") -(12233...)(1-12233 ...00")+... the expression consisting of s+1 terms and the coefficients being Denote this by alternately +1 and -1. |(2238...)(123.... Now construct the expression (124298.00) (1223 Ms...") (1-10) -(1)(1+12... continued to s+1 terms and denote it by (1298) (1223...", and verify that, if it be operated upon by +e, the effect is to change t into t-1. The consequence of this is that if we form the simplest perpetuant of weight 7; and thence the general the expression form enumerated by the generating function 27 1-2.1-2.1-23' viz. :-(1+2)(3+1+1) - ... ±0 (33 +12+12+2) For the case 0=2, 0'=3, the condition is (+) (+) (+)(+73) (0+1)(02+72) (σ2+T3) x(1+T2) (1+T3)(T2+T3)=0. The calculation results in -A BBB+2A B,B2B-A B B B+ A B B₁-2A B&B.B₁ - A B B B+AB B B₁+ A,B B B+AB B-2A,BB,B + ABB₁ =0. By the rules we select the product A,B,B,B, giving the simplest perpetuant of weight 15, viz. :- (2)(3212) (21)a(321)+(2412) (32); and thence the general form (2^2+4) (38+12+114+2) - ... ± (2^2+11 μ1+2) (3+1+1) duc to the generating function 215 (1-7)(1— 23)9(1-29) * For the case 0-1, 0'4, the condition is (+) (+) (+) (+₁)II (T,+7)=0; the calculation gives A₁B (AB₂+ A,B,+B)( - B-A,B,B,- AB₁)=0. (2*3*...*) | (1'23...) (12333...") | - (12*29*s...0*) | (1ª-12^3^*...*^) (1°2233...0*0")] +(122*2*3...00) | (1-22^3^..^^0) (12233...") | continued to t+1 terms, we obtain a solution of a++8=0. To find the enumerating generating function of these forms sup- pose 0, 0, and " to be in ascending order of magnitude, and denote the form by (2*23*8.0*0) (11223.00) (112233.00"). In constructing this we have a choice of two places in which to place the part 1, three places in which to place the part 2, and so on; hence the generating function is 1 1-2.1-2.1-3...1-20.1-2.1-22.1- -20.1-2.1-23...1-20" precisely that of the asyzygetic forms. Hence the constructed expression may be taken to be the general expression of an asyzy- getic form. This idea is easily generalizable to the case of any number of binary forms. Stroh's form of seminvariant being w! (0a++...+σgα ++ B₁++₂ß₂+ ... + Teßo +1 +22+...+"Y"), the first case to consider is 0=1, 0'=1, 0"=1, leading to the con-