8 Based on her email of 13 October 2024, I infer that the applicant has elected not to appear at the hearing of the two interlocutory applications she has filed.
9 I will deal with the interlocutory applications substantively.
BACKGROUND
10 In Reasons 1 (which should be read with these reasons) at [13]–[28] I set out the course of correspondence between the applicant and the Court following the first case management hearing on 2 September 2024. The following matters emerge from that correspondence.
11 On 2 September 2024, I declined to make an interim order suppressing the applicant's identity as a party in the proceeding. This decision was affirmed on 3 September 2024 after the applicant informed the Court that she was basing her application for an interim order on s 37 AI of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (the Federal Court Act).
12 Later, on 3 September 2024, the applicant applied for reasons for that decision based on s 13 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) (the AD(JR) Act). On 4 September 2024, the applicant was informed that the decision not to make an interim suppression order was not a decision to which s 13 of the AD(JR) Act applied. The applicant was also informed, however, that I would provide reasons for not making an interim suppression order when publishing my reasons in respect of the interlocutory application that the applicant was to bring seeking an order that her identity be suppressed.
13 This led the applicant to send an email, a short time thereafter, to the Court which was styled "Application of Recusal on Actual Bias to Justice Yates for consideration". The salient terms of the email are quoted in Reasons 1 at [20].
14 On 5 September 2024, the applicant was informed that if she wished to apply for an order seeking my disqualification from the proceeding on the ground of actual bias, she should proceed formally by filing an interlocutory application seeking that relief and stating the precise basis for it. The applicant was informed on two further occasions that this was the manner in which she should proceed should she wish to pursue an application for an order seeking my disqualification on the ground of actual bias. The applicant resisted taking this course.
15 On 25 September 2024, the applicant commenced a proceeding in the High Court for a constitutional or other writ seeking: (a) an order in the nature of prohibition precluding me
