may also require a legal review. Generally, the legal review will determine:
- whether the investigation complies with requirements in the appointing order and other legal requirements,
- the effects of any errors in the investigation,
- whether the findings (including findings of no fault, no loss, or no wrongdoing) and recommendations are supported by sufficient evidence, and
- whether the recommendations are consistent with the findings.
b. If a legal review is requested or required, it is required before the appointing authority approves the findings and recommendations. After receiving a completed
AR 15-6 investigation, the appointing authority may approve, disapprove, or modify the findings and recommendations, or may direct further action, such as the taking of additional evidence, or making additional findings.
E. CHECKLIST FOR INVESTIGATING OFFICERS
1. Preliminary Matters:
a. Has the appointing authority appointed an appropriate investigating officer based on seniority, availability, experience, and expertise?
b. Does the appointment memorandum clearly state the purpose and scope of the investigation, the points of contact for assistance (if appropriate), and the nature of the findings and recommendations required?
c. Has the initial legal briefing been accomplished?
2. Investigative Plan.
a. Does the investigative plan outline the background information that must be gathered, identify the witnesses who must be interviewed, and order the interviews in the most affective manner?
b. Does the plan identify witnesses no longer in the command and address alternative ways of interviewing them?
c. Does the plan identify information not immediately available and outline steps to quickly obtain the information?
