Like all others in Mexico, it is only a device to raise a temple to such a height as should give it dignity and enable the ceremonies performed on its upper platform to be seen by all the people.
It is indispensably necessary to bear this distinction in mind, in speaking of these monuments, as careless writers connecting the word pyramid with Egypt have been too apt to confound together two classes of monuments entirely distinct and dissimilar. The Egyptian pyramid is always a tomb. The principal object of its erection is in the sepulchral chamber in its centre. It always terminates upwards in a point. In no instance are there external steps leading to a cell or chamber on the apex. In fact, they were always tombs; never temples.' The Assyrian pyramids, on the contrary, have much more affinity with the buildings of which we are now speaking. They were always in terraces, the upper platform was always crowned by a chamber or cell, and there were external steps leading to this, which was the principal object of the erection. In investigating the history of Eastern art this form of temple has been traced from Mesopotamia to the shores of the Eastern Ocean. If we still, however, hesitate to pronounce that there was any connection between the builders of the pyramids of Suku and Oajaca, or the temples of Xochicalco and Boro Buddor, we must at least allow that the likeness is startling and difficult to account for on the theory of mere accidental coincidence.
One thing, at all events, seems clear. If Ave are at any time to trace a connection between the architecture of the New and the Old World it is in the direction above indicated that light is to be looked for. At all events it seems as if it could not now be lonsf before we ascertain whether any connection did exist between the arts of the two continents, or whether we may regard that of America as wholly indigenous.
An image should appear at this position in the text.996. Plan of temple at Mitla
Scale 100 ft. to 1 m.
Almost, however, as if to warn us to beware of jumping too
rapidly to conclusions of this class, we meet in Mexico occasionally
with such a monument as that at
Mitla, which is so entirely original
as to defy the stoutest advocate to
find an associate for it. As will be
seen from the annexed plan, it con-
sists of a portico, measuring 160 ft.
across, its roof supported by a row
of six pillars down the centre, and
having behind it a square building,
measuring about 65 ft, each way, in
the centre of which is a court with four apartments opening into
it, the entrances of which are so arranged as to secure the utmost
amount of privacy. Originally there appear to have been four such
buildings, arranged round a courtyard, but only one is now perfect.
