extremely fertile (Robinson, BR, ii. 154; Palmer, Des. of Ex. ii. 430 f.; cf. Buhl, Edomiter, 15 f.). Buhl accordingly thinks the curse refers only to the barren plateau W of the Arabah; and this is perhaps better than (with Nö. Dri.) to assimilate the terms of the blessing and the curse.
It is probable that J's narrative contained a form of the curse on Esau, but whether any part is preserved in 39f. is doubtful. 39 is certainly from the same source as 28 (E); with regard to 40a the question stands open.—On the metre, see again Sievers, i. 404 f., ii. 78 f., 317. Ba.'s denial of metrical form is based wholly on the doubtful 40b.
41-45. Esau's purpose of revenge.—41. Esau
cherished enmity (5015) against Jacob.—the days of mourning
(5010)] a period of seven days, within which Esau hoped to
accomplish his revenge.—42. Thy brother is going to take satisfaction of thee (Is. 124, Ezk. 513) by killing thee.—44, 45. a few days . . . till he forget] reckoning on Esau's well-known
instability, and at the same time making light of the
trial of separation.—bereaved of you both] The writer has in
view the custom of blood-revenge (cf. 2 Sa. 147), though in
the case supposed there would be no one to execute it.
XXVII. 46-XXVIII. 9.—Isaac's Charge to Jacob (P).
This short section records the only action attributed to Isaac in the Priestly Code. Two facts are taken over from the earlier tradition (JE): Isaac's blessing of Jacob, and Jacob's visit to Mesopotamia. But the unedifying stories of Jacob's treachery, which were the essential link of connexion between them, are here omitted; and a new motive is introduced, viz., the inadmissibility of intermarriage with the inhabitants of Canaan. By transgressing this unwritten law, Esau forfeits his title to the 'blessing of Abraham,' which is thus transferred to Jacob; and Jacob's flight is transformed into an honourable mission in search of a wife. The romantic interest of Jacob's love-story (ch. 29) is largely
43. (Hebrew characters)] G + (Greek characters).—44 f. (Hebrew characters)] as 2920, Dn. 1120; ct.
Gn. 111.—(Hebrew characters) and (Hebrew characters) are obviously doublets, though there are
no data for assigning either to its proper source. G runs both together:
(Greek characters).