able that, with hardly an exception, they are based on the rivalry between Jacob's two wives. (The names are bestowed by the mothers, as is generally the case in JE.) How far genuine elements of tradition are embodied in such a narrative is a question which it is obviously impossible to answer with certainty. We cannot be wrong in attributing historical significance to the distinction between the tribes whose descent was traced to Jacob's wives and those regarded as sons of concubines; though we are ignorant of the actual circumstances on which the classification depends. It is also certain that there is a solid basis for the grouping of the chief tribes under the names of Leah and Rachel, representing perhaps an older and a later settlement of Hebrews in Palestine (Sta. ZATW, i. 112 f.). The fact that all the children except Benjamin are born in Mesopotamia may signify that the leading tribal divisions existed before the occupation of Canaan; but the principle certainly cannot be applied in detail, and the nature of the record forbids the attempt to discover in it reliable data for the history of the tribes. (For a conspectus of various theories, see Luther, ZATW, xxi. 36 ff.; cf. Mey. INS, 291 f., 509 ff.)
The sources are J and E, with occasional clauses from P.—2931-35 is
wholly from J ((Hebrew characters), 31. 32. 33. 35; (Hebrew characters), 31; (Hebrew characters), 34. 35), with the possible exception
of 32b(Greek characters).—301-8 is mainly E ((Hebrew characters), 2. 6. 8; , 3a); but 3a(Greek characters) reminds us of
J (162), 4a is assigned to P ((Hebrew characters) and cf. 163), and in 7 (Hebrew characters) must be either
from J (KS. Ba. Gu.) or P (Ho.).—309-13 is again mostly from J (,
10. 12; cf. 9a with 2931 301 2935). 9b is P.—3014-24 presents a very mixed text,
whose elements are difficult to disentangle; note the double etymologies
in 18. (cf.16) 20. 23f. The hand of E clearly appears in 17a. 18. 20a(Greek characters). 22b(Greek characters). (22a
may be from P: cf. 81) 23. Hence the parallels 14-16. 20a(Greek characters). 24 must be assigned
to J, who is further characterised, according to Gu., by the
numeration of the sons 17b. 19. 20a(Greek characters)). 21 is interpolated.
31-35. The sons of Leah.—31. hated] The rendering
is too strong. (Hebrew characters) is almost a technical term for the less
favoured of two wives (Dt. 2115ff.); where the two are sisters
the rivalry is naturally most acute, hence this practice is
forbidden by the later law (Lv. 1818). The belief that Yahwe
takes the part of the unfortunate wife and rewards her with
children, belongs to the strongly marked family religion of