Jump to content

Page:A critical and exegetical commentary on Genesis (1910).djvu/526

From Wikisource
This page needs to be proofread.

change of subject from 'Jacob' to 'the sons of Jacob' makes it highly probable that v.5 is either redactional (Kue.), or belongs to a different stratum of E.


6a (P). See below.—7. The designation of the place (i.e. the sanctuary: 126 2811) as 'Ēl Bêth'ēl is not confirmed by any other OT allusion. Partial analogies may be found in such place-names as Ašterôth-Ḳarnaim, Nĕbô, Baal-Ḥăẓôr, Baal-Gad, etc., where the name of the deity is extended to the sacred precincts (Gu. 248); but the text is not above suspicion.—there the gods had revealed themselves to him] The pl. vb. together with the use of the art. suggests that the sentence preserves a more polytheistic version of the Bethel-legend than 2812,—one in which the 'angels of God' were spoken of as simply (Symbol missingHebrew characters).—8, 14. The death and burial of Deborah.—below Bêth'ēl] means apparently 'to the S of Bethel.'—under the oak] or 'sacred tree' (see on 126).—tree of weeping] But v.i.14. For the grounds on which this v. is connected with 8, see the footnote ad loc.set up a maẓẓēbāh] So v.20 at the grave of Rachel. These monuments came to be regarded as simple grave-stones; but were doubtless originally objects of worship, as the next clause indicates.—poured out a libation on it] The libation was in the first instance an offering to the dead, according to a custom attested among many ancient peoples,[1] and found in Catholic countries at the present day.—poured oil] 2818.


6a. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] See on 2819. The cl. is an amalgam of P and E.—7. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] G (Symbol missingGreek characters).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] GVS (Symbol missingHebrew characters).—8. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] G om.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] see on 126.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] 'weeping.' The text is perhaps confirmed by (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (weepers), Ju. 25, which may be the same place. But though (Symbol missingHebrew characters) might plausibly be regarded as a corruption of (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (2 Sa. 523ff., Ps. 847), it is difficult to think that (Symbol missingHebrew characters) is so: 'sacred tree of the baka-trees' is an improbable combination (see v. Gall, CSt. 103).

9. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] G + (Symbol missingGreek characters).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] [E]G + (Symbol missingHebrew characters).—10. G simplifies by omitting (Symbol missingHebrew characters) and (Symbol missingHebrew characters).—12. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] S (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (so a schol. in Field).—14. The v. cannot possibly be from P, who recognises no maẓẓebās,

  1. Egyptians (Erman, LAE, 307), Persians (Her. vii. 43), Greeks (Hom. Il. xxiii. 196, Od. xi. 26 ff.), Arabs (We. Heid.2 182 f.). It is not mentioned in OT, but food-offerings to the dead are referred to in Dt. 2614 (To. 418, Sir. 3018).