THE BARBARIAN STATUS OF WOMEN.
It seems altogether probable that in the primitive groups of mankind, when the race first took to a systematic use of tools and so emerged upon the properly human plane of life, there was but the very slightest beginning of a system of status, with little of invidious distinction between classes and little of a corresponding division of employments. In an earlier paper, published in this Journal," it has been argued that the early division of labor between classes comes in as the result of an increasing efficiency of labor, due to a growing effectiveness in the use of tools. When, in the early cultural development, the use of tools and the technical command of material forces had reached a certain degree of effectiveness, the employments which occupy the primitive community would fall into two dis- tinct groups — [a) the honorific employments, which involve a large element of prowess, and [6) the humiliating employments, which call for diligence and into which the sturdier virtues do not enter. An appreciable advance in the use of tools must precede this differentiation of employments, because (i) with- out effective tools (including weapons) men are not sufficiently formidable in conflict with the ferocious beasts to devote them- selves so exclusively to the hunting of large game as to develop that occupation into a conventional mode of life reserved for a distinct class ; (2) without tools of some efficiency, industry is not productive enough to support a dense population, and there- fore the groups into which the population gathers will not come into such a habitual hostile contact with one another as would give rise to a life of warlike prowess ; (3) until industrial methods and knowledge have made some advance, the work of getting a livelihood is too exacting to admit of the consistent exemption of any portion of the community from vulgar labor ;
■ " The Instinct of Workmanship and the Irksomeness of Labor," September, 1898, pp. 187-201.
503
