"There have been extraordinary cases of infantile precocity," said Mr. Filkins, "the truth of which has often been carefully attested. But are you sure this really happened, Mrs. Allgood?"
" Positive," replied the lady. "But do you really think it astonishing that a child of three months should say absolutely nothing? What would you expect it to say?"
"Speaking of death," said Mr. Smoothly, solemnly, "I knew two men, father and son, who died in the same battle during the South African War. They were both named Andrew Johnson and buried side by side, but there was some difficulty in distinguishing them on the headstones. What would you have done?"
"Quite simple," said Mr, Allgood. " They should have described one as 'Andrew Johnson, Senior,' and the other as 'Andrew Johnson, Junior.'"
" But I forgot to tell you that the father died first."
"What difierence can that make?"
"Well, you see, they wanted to be absolutely exact, and that was the difficulty."
"But I don't see any difficulty," said Mr. Allgood, nor could anybody else.
"Well," explained Mr. Smoothly, " it is like this. If the father died first, the son was then no longer 'Junior.' Is that so?"
"To be strictly exact, yes."
"That is just what they wanted—to be strictly exact. Now, if he was no longer 'Junior,' then he did not die ' Junior,' Consequently it must be incorrect so to describe him on the headstone. Do you see the point?"
"Here is a rather curious thing," said Mr. Filkins, " that I have just remembered. A man wrote to me the other day that he had recently discovered two old coins while digging in his garden. One was dated ' 51 B.C.,' and the other one marked ' George I.' How do I know that he was not writing the truth?"
"Perhaps you know the man to be addicted to lying," said Reginald.
"But that would be no proof that he was not telling the truth in this instance."
"Perhaps," suggested Mildred, "you know that there were no coins made at those dates."
"On the contrary, they were made at both periods."
"Were they silver or copper coins?" asked Willie.
"My friend did not state, and I really cannot see, Willie, that it makes any difference."
"I see it!" shouted Reginald. "The letters 'B.C.' would never be used on a coin made before the birth of Christ. They never anticipated the event in that way. The letters were only adopted later to denote dates previous to those which we call 'a.d.' That is very good; but I cannot see why the other statement could not be correct."
"Reginald is quite right," said Mr. Filkins, about the first coin. The second one could not exist, because the first George would never be described in his lifetime as ' George I.'"
"Why not?" asked Mrs. Allgood. " He was George I."
"Yes; but they would not know it until there was a George II."
"Then there was no George II. until George III. came to the throne?"
"That does not follow. The second George becomes 'George II.' on account of there having been a 'George I.'"
"Then the first George was ' George I.' on account of there having been no king of that name before him."
"Don't you see, mother," said George Allgood, "we did not call Queen Victoria ['Vic- toria I.; 'but if there is ever a ' Victoria II.,' then she will be known that way."
"But there have been several Georges, and therefore he was 'George I.' There haven't been several Victorias, so the two cases are not similar."
They gave up the attempt to convince Mrs. Allgood, but the reader will, of course, see the point clearly.
"Here is a question," said Mildred Allgood, "that I should like some of you to settle for me. I am accustomed to buy from our greengrocer bundles of asparagus, each 12 inches in circumference. I always put a tape measure round them to make sure I am getting the full quantity. The other day the man had no large bundles in stock, but handed me instead two small ones, each 6 inches in circumference.
'That is the same thing,' I said, ' and, of course, the price will be the same; 'but he insisted that the two bundles together contained more than the large one, and charged me a few pence extra. Now, what I want to know is, which of us was correct? Would the two small bundles contain the same quantity as the large one ? Or would they contain more?"
"That is the ancient puzzle," said Reginald, laughing, " of the sack of corn that Sempronius borrowed from Caius, which your greengrocer, perhaps, had been reading about somewhere. He caught you beautifully."
"Then they were equal?"
"On the contrary, you were both wrong, and you were badly cheated. You only got half the quantity that would have been contained in a large bundle, and therefore ought to have been charged half the original price, instead of more."
Yes, it was a bad swindle, undoubtedly. A circle with a circumference half that of another must have its area a quarter that of the other. Therefore the two small bundles contained together only half as much asparagus as a large one.
"Mr. Filkins, can you answer this?" asked Willie. "There is a man in the next village who eats two eggs for breakfast every morning."
"Nothing very extraordinary in that," George broke in. "If you told us that the two eggs ate the man it would be interesting."
"Don't interrupt the boy, George," said his mother.
"Well," Willie continued, " this man neither buys, borrows, barters, begs, steals, nor finds the eggs. He doesn't keep hens, and the eggs
