Minority
43
- ↑ Gr. 1. 8. 8; 3.48.9–13; Voet, 4. 4. 12 ff. In Ceylon it is a question whether the remedy of restitutio in integrum has not been impliedly abrogated by the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code. Pereira, p. 811.
- ↑ Voet, 4. 4. 14 ff.
- ↑ Voet, 4. 4. 38.
- ↑ Cens. For. 1. 4. 43. 10; Voet, 4. 4. 39.
- ↑ Voet, 4. 4. 43. See Johnston v. Keiser (1879) K. 166; Vogel & Co. v. Greentley (1903) 24 Natal Law Reports, 252; and for Ceylon Wijesooria v. Ibrahimsa (1910) 13 New Law Reports, 195. In this case the Court upheld a sale of immovable property, though made without sanction of the Court.
- ↑ Voet, 4. 4. 44; Van der Byl v. Solomon (1877) Buch. 25.
- ↑ Gr. 1. 8. 8; 3. 48. 13; Cens. For. 1. 4. 42. 5, and 1. 4. 43. 8–9. Voet speaks on this subject with uncertain voice. See Compendium 4. 1. 5, and Comment. ad Pandect. 4. 1. 16 and 20. The prescription itself may in turn be annulled by restitution. Schorer, ad Gr. 3. 48. 13. Time does not begin to run after full age unless the late minor knew or might have known of the laesio which entitles him to relief. Cens. For. loc. cit.
- ↑ Voet, 4. 4. 45; Haupt v. Haupt (1897) 14 S. C. 39.
- ↑ Voet, ibid.
- ↑ Above puberty. Voet, 4. 4. 46.
- ↑ Cens. For. 1. 4. 43. 13–15; Groen. de leg. abr. ad Cod. 2. 27. 1. The enactment in the Code is attributed to the Emperor Alexander, and there is an authentica of the Emperor Frederick I (2 Lib. Feud. 53. 3) in the same sense. The commentators hesitate to treat such an oath as