Page:Australia and the Empire.djvu/258

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
226
AUSTRALIA AND THE EMPIRE

at the Council-table in Downing Street, a very invidious task for the Minister who may happen to be at the head of the Colonial Office? Would it not be much better if the colonies had an actual voice in the selection, and could submit to her Majesty, through the Imperial Prime Minister, three or more names from which the selection of a Governor might be made? Under this arrangement, without severing the Imperial tie, this supreme office would thus be open to the honourable ambition of a colonist. Let us imagine, as I have said, that a vacancy has occurred in the Governorship of Victoria, and that the two local Houses of Parliament meet in joint conclave[1] to suggest to Her Majesty the names of the most eligible men in the Empire for that post. It may be that the selection would fall thus:—

  1. Hon. George Higinbotham.
  2. The Earl of Carnarvon.
  3. Sir William Foster Stawell.
  1. The nominations of the joint Houses would, I think, be preferable to those of that "small Committee, generally of the Lower House, which has usurped the functions of the Executive, and which we call the Cabinet." Colonial readers who are familiar with Mr. David Syme's most original work, on Representative Government in England, will, I think, on this point, concur. Such a conclave, too, seems in every way better suited for the purpose than a plebiscite.