Jump to content

Page:Bahr v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. (14-56292) Opinion.pdf/1

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT[1]


Sherman Bahr, d/b/a Video One Repair, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Canon U.S.A., Inc.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-56292

D.C. No. 2:13-CV-05259 (GAF) (AJW)

Memorandum

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 6, 2016
Pasadena, California

Before: Vanaskie,[2] Murguia, and Watford, Circuit Judges

Sherman Bahr, the owner of Video One Repair, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims under the Song-Beverly Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1790 et seq., the Cartwright Act, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16720 et seq, and the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. We


  1. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
  2. The Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.