an indictment of high-treaſon, after a hearing of three days, in which the facts alledged againſt him, notoriouſly and flagrantly treaſonable againſt that government, were clearlyproved,
Sidenotes
Footnotes
by one Thomas May, charging him with ſuch a confederacy. The next was in a Petition preſented October 22 to the Houſe, by his wife and his brother Robert, promiſing he ſhould withdraw himſelf with his family into ſome foreign country, provided the money due to him from the State was given to him. This was followed the ſame day, by the Innocent Man’s Second Profer, by himſelf; where he adds to their propoſal another condition, that all ſuch as were willing to tranſplant themſelves with him, ſhould be allowed that liberty, and alſo have all their demands of moneys in arrear from the State paid to them; and further, that ſuch as were poor, and willing to attend him, ſhould have ſome reaſonable allowance of money for that end. The next in order was a Petition, October 23, of the well-affected in and about the cities of London and Weſtminſter, and parts adjacent, preſenters and approvers of the late Petition of the 11th of September, &c. This is a kind of remonſtrance, declaring the Parliament’s unjuſt proceedings in perſecuting him, and averring his undoubted right to be diſcharged. After this, another petition was preſented the ſame day, ſingly by his brother Robert, praying only a ſuſpenſion of his tryal, ’till he ſhould be able to convince him of his miſtakes, or, if not, prevail with him to leave the kingdom. Laſt of all, Mrs Lilburne, almoſt diſtracted with the fear of loſing her conſort, preſſed him (as did alſo one Mr Valentine and ſome other friends) to ſtoop as low as poſſibly he could to ſave his life, in which her’s was lock’d up. Whereupon, moved by her bitter mourning and crying, and the beholding the anguiſh of ſpirit of her that had been ſo faithful and hazardous a yoak-fellow to him in his above ſeven years ſorrow, wrung from him, with much ado, the following letter to Mr Lenthal the Speaker.
‘Honoured Sir,As a man, being at preſent ſomewhat confounded in myſelf, through a ſtrong confidence of my own innocency, having ſuffered above meaſure, but intentionally done injury unto none, and preſs’d under, with the importunity of friends, eſpecially with the heart-breaking ſighs of my dear but even half-diſtracted wife; as, when my late children lay in a moſt diſconſolate condition (which ended their lives), your Houſe did me the favour to grant me my liberty[citation 1] to viſit them, which I think was the ſaving of her life: ſo now, greater importunities lying upon me from divers, and her that is dearer unto me than many lives, I as earneſtly intreat you to move your Houſe, in the moſt effectual manner you can, that my tryal (ſo ſuddenly intended) may for ſome reaſonable time be ſuſpended, that ſo I may have time to hear and conſider, what many of them ſay they have to offer by way of reaſon and argument, to perſwade me to what at preſent my conſcience is not convinced of. And I ſhould likewiſe be deſirous, if your Houſe ſhould judge convenient, that ſome competent number of gentlemen of your Houſe might be permitted to debate with me thoſe particulars, wherein I have appeared moſt to differ with other mens judgments; whereby, poſſibly, rational arguments may be ſo ſtrongly urged, as, peradventure, may give ſuch ſatisfaction, as may tend to the reconciling many differences: upon the knowledge of the acceptance of which, during all that time of ſuſpenſion of tryal, I do hereby faithfully promiſe not in the leaſt to diſturb thoſe that ſhall grant me this favour, being not ſo apt to make diſturbance as is conceived; and herein you will exceedingly oblige,From the Tower of London, this 24th of Octob. 1649.
|
SIR, Yours, to ſerve you, John Lilburne.’ |
Citations
- ↑ (127) The urging of this favour, as a precedent to procure another, would, in almoſt any other perſon’s life, be a diſtinguiſhing mark of confident aſſurance, ſince he made uſe of that favour to diſperſe one of the very pamphlets for which he was now indicted. See his trial, p. 79.
- ↑ * ’Tis obſervable, that, in the point of Law, Lilburne often quotes Lord Clarendon’s ſpeech for aboliſhing the Court of York; which may be ſeen in his article, remark [H].
- ↑ (128) The Lord Grey of Groby, Colonel Ludlow, Mr Robinſon, and Colonel Martin, were ſerviceable to him in procuring this diſcharge. Trial, p. 155.
- ↑ (129) Ibid.
- ↑ (130) He concludes his defence with a full reliance on his jury, as his ſole judges and keepers of his life, at whoſe hands the Lord would require his blood, in caſe they left any part of his indictment to the cruel and bloody men upon the bench, above the received doctrine of thoſe times. Ibid. p. 141.
ſeen