Page:Carnegie Flexner Report.djvu/148

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
130
MEDICAL EDUCATION

alive to their responsibility are, as we shall see, at this moment able to provide on this scale for each of the fundamental departments; but they are in no doubt that these departments need such support; and they are straining every effort to procure it for them.[1]

On the clinical side, the problem is more complicated. We have seen that the relation of the medical school to its hospital must be of the same kind as its relation to its laboratories. But laboratories exist only for school purposes; the hospital dis-

  1. A comparison of the estimates above given with corresponding budgets in German universities is highly suggestive. Despite the fact that the cost of apparatus, supplies, etc., is much lower in Germany than here, the sums spent in various universities on laboratory maintenance are as follows:
    Königsberg (170 medical students) Breslau (189 medical students)
    Anatomy
    Pathology
    16,349 marks
    9,860 marks
    Anatomy
    Pathology
    26,618 marks
    14,932 marks
    Berlin (1107 medical students) Göttingen (189 medical students)
    Anatomy
    Physiology
    57,436 marks
    89,766 marks
    Anatomy
    Physiology
    19,850 marks
    9,606 marks

    (From Etat des Ministeriums der Unterrichts- und Medizinal Angelegenheiten, 1909, Beilage 6.)

    Still more significant is the ratio between expenditure for salaries and that for laboratory maintenance, and the steady encroachment of the latter: out of every 100 marks spent in German universities, there went in

    1868 45.95 marks to salaries 37.07 marks to laboratories
    1878 41.94 marks to salaries 40.46 marks to laboratories
    1888 36.00 marks to salaries 47.18 marks to laboratories
    1902 29.46 marks to salaries 53.77 marks to laboratories
    1906 27.93 marks to salaries 55.45 marks to laboratories

    (From Preussiche Statistik, 204: Statistik der preussischen Landes Universitäten, 1908, p, 7.)

    Finally, the actual sums spent on salaries and laboratories respectively tell the same significant story:

    Total expenditure in Prussian universities in

    1868 1,786,108 marks for salaries 1,440,955 marks for laboratories
    1878 2,959,187 marks for salaries 2,959,103 marks for laboratories
    1888 3,305,125 marks for salaries 4,331,649 marks for laboratories
    1898 3,499,785 marks for salaries 6,094,316 marks for laboratories
    1906 4,308,980 marks for salaries 8,554,581 marks for laboratories

    (Ibid., p. 14.)

    That is, in 38 years, total salaries have increased 141 per cent, total laboratory expense, 490 per cent. In the same period, the total attendance of medical students in the same univers/ties has risen 113 per cent (from 2771 in winter semester, 1868, to 5903, winter semester, 1906).

    Paulsen (German Universities, translated by Thilly, p. 219, note) quotes from the Rector's Address of Adolph Wagner in 1896:

    "Expenditures for salaries and institutes in the University of Berlin show the following growth:

    Year Salaries Institutes
    1811 116,500 marks (71.8 per cent) 39,294 marks (24.0 per cent)"
    1834 193,650 marks (64.6 per cent) 78,434 marks (26.2 per cent)"
    1880 321,000 marks (52.8 per cent) 267,000 marks (40.1 per cent)"
    1896-7 865,000 marks (30.9 per cent) 1,481,000 marks (52.9 per cent)"

    All the seminaries in the mental sciences (there are 18) cost 17,650 marks annually; the 15 natural-scientific institutes and collections cost 379,798 marks; the 10 medical-scientific institutes 190,054 marks; the 10 clinical institutes, 617,691 marks.

    The publications of the Prussian government mentioned above are models, which we would do well to adopt. They enable us to follow in minute detail the educational developments of the last seventy-five years, with their social implications. The American student of similar problems deals with chaos. It is difficult to obtain definite and complete statements from any one institution; and quite impossible to compare data from several institutions without exhaustive inquiry by way of ascertaining whether they cover the same ground. The German statistics prove clearly, however, the point at issue, i. e., the rapidly increasing cost of properly organized medical education.