magnitude of the angle depends solely upon the difference of direction of its sides at the vertex.'
Min. But the difference of direction also possesses 'magnitude.' Is that magnitude a wholly independent entity? Or does it, in its turn, depend to some extent upon the angle? Seriously, all these subtleties must be very trying to a beginner. But we had better proceed to the next Theorem. I am anxious to see where, in this system, these creatures of the imagination, these sepcodal Lines, are to appear as actually existent.
Nie. We next prove (p. 9. § 30) that Lines, which have the same direction, make equal angles with all transversals.
Min. That is merely a particular case of your last Theorem.
Nie. And then that two Lines, which make equal angles with a transversal, have the same direction.
Min. Ah, that would bring them into existence at once! Let us hear the proof of that.
Nie. The proof is that if, through the point where the first Line is cut by the transversal, a Line be drawn having the same direction as the second, it makes equal angles with the transversal, and therefore coincides with the first Line.
Min. You assume, then, that a Line can be drawn through that point, having the same direction as the second Line?
Nie. Yes.
Min. That is, you assume, without proof, that different Lines can have the same direction. On the whole, then, though Mr. Pierce's system differs slightly from Mr.
L 2
