Page:Carroll - Euclid and His Modern Rivals.djvu/277

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
TODHUNTER.
239

examiners at Cambridge the subject of geometrical conics is the most embarrassing which occurs at present, and this fact suggests a conclusion very different from that which is laid down in the preceding quotation. Of course there will be no trouble in examining a single school, because the system there adopted will be known and followed by the examiner.

I have no wish to exaggerate the difficulty; but I consider it to be real and serious, more especially as it presents itself at the outset of a youth's career, and so may cause disappointment just when discriminating encouragement is most valuable. But I think the matter must be left almost entirely to the discretion of examiners; the attempts which have been made to settle it by regulation do not seem to me very happy. For example, I read: "As the existing text-books are not very numerous, it would not be too much to require examiners to be acquainted with them sufficiently for the purpose of testing the accuracy of written, or even, if necessary, of oral answers." The language seems to me truly extraordinary. Surely examiners are in general men of more mathematical attainments than this implies; for it would appear that all we can expect them to do is to turn to some text-book and see if the student has correctly reproduced it. The process in a viva voce examination would be rather ignominious if when an answer had been returned by a candidate some indifferent manual had to be consulted to see if the answer was correct.

I have heard that an examining board has recently issued instructions to its executive officers to make themselves acquainted with the various text-books. This does not enjoin distinctly, what the above quotation implies, that the examiner is to accept all demonstrations which are in print as of nearly equal value; but it seems rather to suggest such a course. The point is important and should be settled. Suppose a candidate offered something taken from the Essentials of Geometry, and the examiner was convinced that the treatment was inadequate or unsound; then is the candidate nevertheless to