QUEVEDO
603
QUEVEDO
sarily entailed the assertion of an intrinsic difference
in regard to gratuity as well as to efficacy, between
the grace of the Creator and the grace of the Re-
deemer. "The grace of Adam produced only human
merits" (prop. 34); but "being a consequence of the
creation, it was due to nature when whole and un-
impaired" (prop. 35). Its loss through the original
fall mutilated our nature, and man having become
"a sinner is, without the grace of the Liberator, free
only to do evil" (prop. 38). Moreover, this grace
"is never given except by faith" (prop. 26). Faith
which "is the first grace and the source of all the
others" (prop. 27), is to be understood as "operative
faith, and it works only by charity" (prop. 51).
Consequently "outside of the Church no grace is
given" (prop. 29), and "the first grace given to the
sinner being the remission of sins" (prop. 28), all
his acts, as long as he remains a sinner, are sins (prop.
44-8), so that "the prayer of the wicked is a new sin,
and what God grants to them is a fresh condemna-
tion" (prop. 59).
This is all resumed in the thesis of the double contrary love: "There are only two loves, from which all our volitions and all our actions spring: the love of God (charity properly so called) which refers everything to God and which God rewards; and love of self and of the world, which is evil as it does not refer to God what should be referred to Him" (prop. 44). From this follow not only the uselessness, but the malice and the evil effects of attrition, that is, of all repentance which does not arise from pure charity; for, "fear restrains only the hands; the heart remains attached to sin, as long as it is not led by the love of justice" (prop. 61); and "he who refrains from e\nl only through fear of punishment has already sinned in his heart " (prop. 62). Thus, the erroneous conception of the really gratuitous and supernatural character of the original grace bore its legitimate fruits, rigorism and despair; it resulted, as far as concerns attrition, in a conclusion already condemned by the Council of Trent. In Quesnel we find likewise the doctrine of the "Augustinus" (see Jansenius). Like that famous book, the "Reflex- ions Morales" did not admit either purely sufficient grace or real liberty of indifference; on the con- trary, it denied them in many formulas "Grace is the operation of the omnipotent hand of God, which nothing can hinder or retard" (prop. 10), "it is noth- ing but the omnipotent will of God who commands and who executes his commands" (prop. 11). "When God, no matter when or where, wishes to save a soul, the will of God is infallibly carried into effect" (prop. 12). "When God wills to save a soul and touches it with the interior hand of his grace, no human will can resist it" (prop. 13); "there is no attraction but yields to the attraction of grace, be- cause nothing resists the Omnipotent" (prop. 16). In a word, the action of grace can and must be likened to that by which God created the world, realized the Incarnation, raised Jesus Christ from the dead, and by which He worked every other miracle (prop. 20-5).
Having admitted all this, it is not astonishing that the Divine precepts cannot be observed by men of good will who make the effort. For, on the one hand, "the grace of Jesus Christ, the efficacious principle of all good, is necessary for any good work whatsoever; without it not only is nothing done but nothing can be done" (prop. 2); "the will with- out prevenient grace h;is no light save to go wrong, no zeal but to hasten to destruction, no strength but to wound itself: it is capable of all evil, and incapable of any good" (prop. 39). On the other hand, when grace is present and acting one never resists it. If therefore anyone fail in his duty, it can only be because he has not received the indispensable grace. For "grace is that voice of the Father teaching men interiorly and leading them to Jesus Christ; who-
ever, having heard the exterior voice of the Son, docs
not come to him, has not been taught by the Father"
(prop. 17). And yet, according to Quesnd, man will
be held guilty and condemned for those transgres-
sions which he cannot possibly avoid (prop. 40).
But, since the observing of commandments and
therefore of the conditions necessary for salvation is
not within the reach of all, it is evident that neither
the intention of God to save nor the efficacy of the
sufferings of the Saviour extend to all mankind. So
"all those whom God wishes to save through Christ
are infallibly saved" (prop. 30), and if "Christ Him-
self delivered Himself up to death", it was solely "to
snatch the first-born, that is the elect, from the
hand of the exterminating angel" (prop. 32).
All these extraordinary ideas of Quesnel's concern- ing grace, and his obstinate defence of them against legitimate authority had, as a practical and logical result, a second group of errors no less serious about the Church, its membership, discipline, and govern- ment in general. According to Quesnel, the Church is invisible; for it comprises "as members only the saints" or "the elect and the just" (prop. 72-7), and "a person is separated from it by not living ac- cording to the Gospel as much as by not believing in the Gospel" (prop. 78). It is an abuse in the Church "to forbid Christians to read the Holy Scriptures and especially the Gospel" (prop. 85), for this reading "is necessary to all, in every place and at all times" (prop. 79-84). "It is the Church that has the power of excommunicating, to be used by the chief pastors with the consent, at least pre- sumed, of the whole body" (prop. 90). This, as the author states explicitly in his seventh "Memoire", supposes that the multitude of the faithful, without distinction of rank, is properly speaking the sole depository of all ecclesiastical power; but, as it can- not exercise this power by itself, the community en- trusts it to the bishops and the pope, who are its agents and its mandatories; and, in this sense, the pope is only "the ministerial head" of the episcopal body. Moreover, "the fear of an unjust excom- munication must never keep us from doing our duty" (prop. 91), "to suffer in peace an undeser\'ed excom- munication and anathema rather than betray the truth is to imitate St. Paul " (prop. 92). The directly personal character and object of these last declara- tions are apparent. The same may be said of the articles that protest against the abuse of multiply- ing oaths among Christians (prop. 101), or speak of the contempt, intolerance, and persecution to which truth is subjected (prop. 93-100), and which, crown- ing this sad arraignment with an assertion more offensive than the others, see in the abuses pretended to have been discovered "one of the most striking proofs of the senile decay of the Church" (prop. 95).
Lafiteau, Histoire de hi Constitution Unigenitus (Li^ge, 1738) ; ScHiLL, Die Constitution Unigenitus (Freiburg, KTB).
J. Forget.
Quevedo, Joan de, Franciscan, native of Bejori, Old Castile, Spain; d. at Barcelona, 24 December, 1519. His antecedents are unknown. At the re- quest of King Ferdinand, husband of Queen Isabella, Pope Leo X, on 28 August, 1513, appointed Quevedo bishop of Santa Maria de la Antigua, or Darien, on the Isthmus, and he thus became the first bishop on the mainland of America. Accompanied by several Franciscans, Bishop Quevedo on 12 April, 1514, em- barked at San Lucar with Pedrarias (Pedro Arias de Avila, or Davila), who had been named governor of Darien. The expedition reached its destination 30 June. The governor and his officers, despite royal warnings to heed the advice of Quevedo, committed the most frightful cruelties, not only against the In- dians, but also again.'it rivals, of which the beheading of Vasco Nunez de Balboa, the discoverer of the
