EUCHARIST
587
EUCHARIST
blood, abideth in me, and I in him" (John, vi, 57).
St. Cyril of Alexandria (Horn, in Joan., IV, xvii) beau-
tifully represents this mystical union as the fusion of
our being into that of the God-man, as " when melted
wax is fused with other wax". Since the Sacrament
of Love is not satisfied with an increase of habitual
love only, but tends especially to fan the flame of
actual love to an intense ardour, the Holy Eucharist is
^specifically distinguished from the other sacraments,
'and hence it is precisely in this latter effect that
Suarez recognizes the so-called " grace of the sacra-
ment", which otherwise is so hard to discern. It
stands to reason that the essence of this union by love
consists neither in a natural union with Jesus analo-
gous to that between soul and body, nor in a hypos-
tatic union of the soul with the Person of the Word,
nor finally in a pantheistical deification of the com-
municant, but simply in a moral but wonderful union
with Christ by the bond of the most ardent charity.
Hence the chief effect of a worthy Communion is to a
certain extent a foretaste of heaven, in fact the antici-
pation and pledge of our future union with God by
love in the Beatific Vision. He alone can properly es-
timate the precious boon which Catholics possess in
the Holy Eucharist, who knows how to ponder these
ideas of Holy Communion to their utmost depth. The
immediate result of this union with Christ by love is
the bond of charity existing between the faithful
themselves, as St. Paul says: "For we, being many,
are one bread, one body, all that partake of one
bread" (I Cor., x, 17). And so the Communion of
Saints is not merely an ideal union by faith and grace,
but an eminently real union, mysteriously constituted,
maintained, and guaranteed by partaking in common
of one and the same Christ.
(b) A second fruit of this union with Christ by love is an increase of sanctifying grace in the soul of the worthy communicant. Here let it be remarked at the outset, that the Holy Eucharist does not per se consti- tute a person in the state of grace as do the sacraments of the dead (baptism and penance), but presupposes such a state. It is, therefore, one of the sacraments of the living. It is as impossible for the soul in the state of mortal sin to receive this Heavenly Bread with profit, as it is for a corpse to assimilate food and drink. Hence the Council of Trent (Sess. XIII, can. v), iii op- position to Luther and Calvin, purposely defined, that the " chief fruit of the Eucharist does not consist in the forgiveness of sins". For though Christ said of the Chalice: "This is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins" (Matt., xxvi, 28), He had in view an effect of the sacrifice, not of the sacrament; for He did not say that His Blood would be drunk unto remission of sins, but shed for that purpose. It is for this very reason that St. Paul (I Cor., xi, 28) demands that rigorous ".self-examina- tion", in order to avoid the heinous offence of being guilty of the Body and the Blood of the Lord by " eat- ing and drinking unworthily", and that the Fathers insist upon nothing so energetically as upon a pure and innocent conscience. In spite of the principles ju.st laid down, the question might be asked, if the Blessed Sacrament could not at times per accidens free the commimicant from mortal sin, if he approached the Table of the Lord unconscious of the sinful state of his soul. Presupposing what is self-eviilcnt, that there is question neither of a conscious sacrilcj;iiius (.'ommun- ion nor a lack of imperfect contritioti (dltrilio), which would ahogether hinder the justifying effect of the sacrament, theologians incline to the opinion, that in such exceptional cases the Eucharist can restore the soul to the state of grace, but all without exception deny the possibility of the reviviscence of a sacrile- gious or unfruitful Communion after the restoration of the soul's proper moral condition has been effected, the Eucharist being different in this respect from the sacraments which imprint a character upon the soul
(baptism, confirmation, and Holy orders). Together
with the increase of sanctifying grace there is associ-
ated another effect, namely, a certain spiritual relish
or delight of soul (delectalio spirituaUs). Just as food
and drink delight and refresh the heart of man, so does
this "Heavenly Bread containing within itself all
sweetness" produce in the soul of the devout com-
municant ineffable bliss, which, however, is not to be
confounded with an emotional joy of the soul or with
sensible sweetness. Although both may occur as the
result of a special grace, its true nature is manifested in
a certain cheerful and willing fervour in all that regards
Christ and His Church, and in the conscious fulfilment
of the duties of one's state of life, a disposition of soul
which is perfectly compatible with interior desolation
and spiritual dryness. A good Communion is recog-
nized less in the transitory sweetness of the emotions
than in its lasting practical effects on the conduct of
our daily lives.
(c) Though Holy Communion does not per se remit mortal sin, it has nevertheless the third effect of " blot- ting out venial sin and preserving the soul from mortal sin" (Council of Trent, Sess. XIII, cap. ii). The Holy Eucharist is not merely a food, but a medicine as well. The destruction of venial sin and of all affection to it, is readily understood on the basis of the two central ideas mentioned above. Just as material food ban- ishes minor bodily weaknesses and preserves man's physical strength from being impaired, so does this food of our souls remove our lesser spiritual ailments and preserve us from spiritual death. As a union based upon love, the Holy Eucharist cleanses with its purifying flame the smallest stains which adhere to the soul, and at the same time serves as an effective prophy- lactic against grievous sin. It only remains for us to ascertain with clearness the manner in which this pre- servative influence against relapse into mortal sin is exerted. According to the teaching of the Roman Catechism, it is effected by the allaying of concupis- cence, which is the chief source of deadly sin, particu- larly of impurity. Therefore it is that spiritual writers recommend frequent Communion as the most effective remedy against impurity, since its powerful influence is felt even after other means have proved un- availing (cf. St. Thomas, III, Q. Ixxix, a. 6). Whether or not the Holy Eucharist is directly conducive to the remission of the temporal punishment due to sin, is disputed by St. Thomas (ibid., a. 5), since the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar was not instituted as a means of satisfaction ; it does, however, produce an indirect effect in this regard, which is proportioned to the com- municant's love and devotion. The ca.se is different as regards the effects of grace in behalf of a third party. The pious custom of the faithful of " offering their Com- munion" for relations, friends, and the souls departed, is to be considered as possessing unquestionable value, in the first place, becauseanearnestprayerof petition in the presence of the Spouse of our souls will readily find a hearing, and then, because the fruits of Communion as a means of satisfaction for sin may be applied to a third person, and especially per modum suffragii to the souls in purgatory.
(d) As a last effect we may mention that the Eu- charist is the " pledge of our glorious resurrection and eternal happine-ss" (Council of Trent, Sess. XIII, cap. ii), according to the promise of Christ: " He that eateth my flcsli and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up on the last day." Hence the chief reason why the ancient Fathers, as Ignatius (Ephes., 20), Iren;pus (Adv. haer., IV, xviii, 4), and TertuUian (I)e resurr. cam., viii), as well as later pa- tristic writers, insisted so strongly uiion our future res- urrection, was the circumstance that it is the door by which we enter upon unending happiness. There can be nothing incongruous or improper in the fact that the body also shares in this effect of Communion, since by its physical contact with the EucharLstic species,
