It is seen from the above, that as the thickness of the air-space was gradually increased, the reflected component increased, while the transmitted portion decreased. The minimum thickness for total reflection was found to be about 8 mm. When the thickness of air-space was reduced to about half this thickness (slightly less than half) the reflected and the transmitted portions seemed to be about equal.
With the radiator R1 the minimum thickness for total reflection was found to be equal to the thickness of 22 cards (9·9 mm.). When the thickness of air-space was reduced to the thickness of 10 cards (4·5 mm.) the reflected and the transmitted portions seemed to be about equal. As two experiments immediately following each other are more likely to be comparable, the experiments were so arranged that the observation of deflection for transmission with a certain thickness of air followed the observation for reflection with a different thickness, the corresponding deflections being about equal. As stated above, the reflected and the transmitted portions were approximately equal when the thickness of air was equal to the thickness of 10 cards. Keeping 10 as the mean, pairs of readings were taken with different thicknesses. For example, the reflection reading with a thickness of air equal to the thickness of 4 cards was followed by taking a reading for transmission, with a thickness of air equal to the thickness of 16 cards; the deflections produced in the two cases were about equal, namely sixty-six divisions of the scale.
I append below a table showing the corresponding thicknesses of air (in terms of number of cards) which gave approximately equal deflections, the deflection in one case being due to the reflected component, and in
