Page:Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968 (UKPGA 1968-20 qp).pdf/13

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
10Ch. 20
Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968

Part II

his retrial, is the expiration of the period of twenty-eight days beginning with the date of the finding.

(6) Schedule 1 to this Act contains additional provisions applicable to a retrial authorised by order of the Appeal Court under section 19 of this Act; and of the four Parts of the Schedule, Part I applies to retrial under the Naval Discipline Act; Part II applies to retrial under the Army Act; Part III applies to retrial under the Air Force Act; and Part IV applies to all three cases.

Insanity

Appeal against finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. 21.—(1) A person who has been tried by court-martial for an offence and been found not guilty by reason of insanity may, with the leave of the Appeal Court, appeal to the Court against the finding; and in relation to any such appeal this Part of this Act, except sections 13 to 16, shall apply, subject to this section and section 22 below, as it applies in relation to an appeal by a person convicted against his conviction (with the necessary adaptations of references to a person convicted or to conviction).

(2) Where apart from this subsection—

(a) an appeal against a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity would fall to be allowed; and
(b) none of the grounds for allowing it relates to the question of the insanity of the appellant,

the Appeal Court may dismiss the appeal if they are of opinion that but for the insanity of the appellant the proper finding would have been that he was guilty of an offence other than the offence charged.

Consequences where appeal under s. 21 allowed. 22.—(1) The following provisions shall have effect where an appeal against a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity is allowed by the Appeal Court.

(2) If the ground, or one of the grounds, for allowing the appeal is that the finding as to the appellant's insanity ought not to stand and the Appeal Court are of opinion that the proper finding would have been a finding of guilty of an offence (whether the offence charged or any other offence of which the court-martial could have found him guilty), the Court shall substitute for the finding of the court-martial a finding of guilty of that offence.

(3) On substituting a finding of guilty of an offence, the Appeal Court shall have the like powers of sentencing the appellant, and other powers, as the court-martial which tried him