taken a particular pride in its success, as every lover oi the game does in the county he represents, and was pleased to know that my individual efforts with bat and ball had helped to give it a high position. But then I had been supported by a team of amateurs that many a captain might envy. To name them, and give their doings, would take more space than can be well afforded: but I cannot allow this year to pass without saying something about my brother Fred's share in the good work, for it was his last amongst us. He died before the season was over, and before he had completed his 3oth year. The blow to my family and Gloucestershire county was more than I can find words to express; indeed, no words can express it. But I know that not only Gloucestershire, but the cricketing world, sustained a heavy loss by his death. I think I may be allowed to say of him, with pardonable pride, that he was a brilliant field, a splendid batsman, and a fairly successful bowler in first-class company; and that his memory is cherished by every player who knew him. I give his batting performances for his county, and will let them speak for themselves. He played—
| Completed Innings. |
Runs. | Most in an Innings. |
Average. | |
| 1879 to 1874 | 34 | 1199 | 165* | 35.26 |
| 1875 | 12 | 430 | 180* | 35.83 |
| 1876 | 12 | 297 | 78 | 24.75 |
| 1877 | 15 | 441 | 98 | 29.40 |
| 1878 | 14 | 418 | 73* | 29.85 |
| 1879 | 15 | 211 | 57 | 14.06 |
| 1880 | 13 | 320 | 83 | 24.61 |
The Gentlemen v. Players' matches resulted in a win to each. The first, at the Oval, the Players won by 37 runs, in a great degree owing to the fine bowling of Alfred Shaw and Morley, who bowled in great form, as
