Part I.
(4) Where an appeal under section 12 of this Act is allowed, the following provisions apply:—
- (a) if the ground, or one of the grounds, for allowing the appeal is that the finding of the jury as to the insanity of the accused ought not to stand and the Court of Appeal are of opinion that the proper verdict would have been that he was guilty of an offence (whether the offence charged or any other offence of which the jury could have found him guilty), the Court—
- (i) shall substitute for the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity a verdict of guilty of that offence; and
- (ii) shall, subject to subsection (5) below, have the like powers of punishing or otherwise dealing with the appellant, and other powers, as the court of trial would have had if the jury had come to the substituted verdict; and
- (b) in any other case, the Court of Appeal shall substitute for the verdict of the jury a verdict of acquittal.
(5) The Court of Appeal shall not by virtue of subsection (4)(a) above sentence any person to death; but where under that paragraph they substitute a verdict of guilty of an offence for which apart from this subsection they would be required to sentence the appellant to death, their sentence shall (whatever the circumstances) be one of imprisonment for life.
(6) An order of the Court of Appeal allowing an appeal in accordance with this section shall operate as a direction to the court of trial to amend the record to conform with the order.
Hospital order on disposal of appeal. 14.—(1) Where, on an appeal under section 12 of this Act, the Court of Appeal are of opinion that the case is not one where there should have been a verdict of acquittal but that there should have been a finding that the accused was under disability, the Court shall make an order that the appellant be admitted to such hospital as may be specified by the Secretary of State.
(2) Where in accordance with section 13(4)(b) of this Act the Court of Appeal substitute a verdict of acquittal, and they are of opinion—
- (a) that the appellant is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which warrants his detention in a hospital under observation (with or without other medical treatment) for at least a limited period; and
