Page:Debates in the Several State Conventions, v1.djvu/107

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
1778.]
OBJECTIONS—CONNECTICUT, NEW JERSEY
87

appropriated by Congress for the benefit of the whole confederacy—reserving, however, to the states, within whose limits such crown lands may be, the entire and complete jurisdiction thereof."

Question put—passed in the negative; 1 ay, 9 noes.

The delegates from CONNECTICUT, being called on, produced instructions, and thereupon moved the following amendments:—

1st. In the 8th article, after the words "in proportion to," strike out what follows, to the end of the sentence, and in lieu thereof insert "the number of inhabitants in each state."

Question put—passed in the negative; 3 ayes, 9 noes.

2d. In the 9th article, at the end of the 5th paragraph, add the words following: "provided, that no land army shall be kept up by the United States in time of peace; nor any officers or pensioners kept in pay by them, who are not in actual service, except such as are or may be rendered unable to support themselves, by wounds received in battle, in the service of the said states, agreeably to the provisions already made by a resolution of Congress."

Question put—passed in the negative; 1 ay, 11 noes.


Thursday, June 25, 1778.—Congress took into consideration the representation from NEW JERSEY, on the Articles of Confederation, which was read as follows:—

"To the United States in Congress assembled, the representation of the Legislative Councils and General Assembly of the state of New Jersey showeth,

"That the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, between the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, proposed by the honorable Congress of the said states, severally, for their consideration, have been by us fully and attentively considered, on which we beg leave to remark as follows:—

"1st. In the 5th article, where, among other things, the qualifications of the delegates from the several states are described, there is no mention of any oath, test, or declaration, to be taken or made by them previous to their admission to seats in Congress. It is indeed to be presumed, the respective states will be careful that the delegates they send to assist in managing the general interests of the Union take the oaths to the government from which they derive their authority; but as the United States, collectively considered, have interests as well as each particular state, we are of opinion that some test or obligation, binding upon each delegate, while he continues in the trust, to consult and pursue the former as well as the latter, and particularly to assent to no vote or proceeding which may violate the general confederation, is necessary. The laws and usages of all civilized nations evince the propriety of an oath on such occasions, and the more solemn and important the deposit, the more strong and explicit ought the obligation to be.

"2d. By the 6th and 9th articles, the regulation of trade seems to be committed to the several states within their separate jurisdiction, in such a degree as may involve many difficulties and embarrassments, and be attended with injustice to some states in the Union. We are of opinion that the sole and exclusive power of regulating the trade of the United