the consideration of the committee appointed to draw up the standing rules, and that the committee make report thereon.
Adjourned till to-morrow, at ten o'clock.
Tuesday, May 29.
In Convention.—John Dickinson and Elbridge Gerry, the former from Delaware, the latter from Massachusetts, took their seats. The following rules were added, on the report of Mr. Wythe, from the committee:—
"That no member be absent from the House, so as to interrupt the representation of the state, without leave.
"That committees do not sit whilst the House shall be, or ought to be, sitting.
"That no copy be taken of any entry on the Journal, during the sitting of the House, without leave of the House.
"That members only be permitted to inspect the Journal.
"That nothing spoken in the House be printed, or otherwise published, or communicated, without leave.
"That a motion to reconsider a matter which has been determined by a majority may be made, with leave unanimously given, on the same day on which the vote passed; but otherwise, not without one day's previous notice; in which last case, it the House agree to the reconsideration, some future day shall be assigned for that purpose."
Mr. C. PINCKNEY moved, that a committee be appointed to superintend the minutes.
Mr. G. MORRIS objected to it. The entry of the proceedings of the Convention belonged to the secretary as their impartial officer. A committee might have an interest and bias in moulding the entry according to their opinions and wishes.
The motion was negatived—five noes, four ayes.
Mr. RANDOLPH then opened the main business:—
He expressed his regret that it should fall to him, rather than those who were of longer standing in life and political experience, to open the great subject of their mission. But as the Convention had originated from Virginia, and his colleagues supposed that some proposition was expected from them, they had imposed this task on him.
He then commented on the difficulty of the crisis, and the necessity of preventing the fulfilment of the prophecies of the American downfall.
He observed, that, in revising the federal system, we ought to inquire, first, into the properties which such a government ought to possess; secondly, the defects of the Confederation; thirdly, the danger of our situation; and, fourthly, the remedy.
1. The character of such a government ought to secure, first, against foreign invasion; secondly, against dissensions between members of the Union, or seditions in particular states; thirdly, to procure to the several states various blessings, of which an isolated situation was incapable; fourthly, it should be able to defend itself against encroachment; and, fifthly, to be paramount to the state constitutions.
2. In speaking of the defects of the Confederation, he professed a high respect for Its authors, and considered them as having done all that patriots could do, in the then infancy of the science of constitutions and of confederacies; when the inefficiency of requisitions was unknown—no commercial discord had arisen among any states—no rebellion had appeared, as in Massachusetts—foreign debts had not become urgent—the havoc of paper money had not been foreseen—treaties had not been
