Mr. SHERMAN. It means neither more nor less than the Confederation, as it relates to this subject.
Mr. ELLSWORTH moved that the report delivered in by Gov. Livingston should lie on the table; which was agreed to, nem. con.
Article 7, sect. 3, was then resumed.
Mr. DICKINSON moved to postpone this, in order to reconsider article 4, sect. 4, and to limit the number of representatives to be allowed to the large states. Unless this were done, the small states would be reduced to entire insignificance, and encouragement giver to the importation of slaves.
Mr. SHERMAN would agree to such a reconsideration, but did not see the necessity of postponing the section before the House. Mr. Dickinson withdrew his motion.
Article 7, sect. 3, was then agreed to,—ten ayes; Delaware alone no.
Mr. SHERMAN moved to add to section 3 the following clause:—
"And all accounts of supplies furnished, services performed, and moneys advanced, by the several states to the United States, or by the United States to the several states, shall be adjusted by the same rule."
Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS seconds the motion.
Mr. GORHAM thought it wrong to insert this in the Constitution. The legislature will no doubt do what is right. The present Congress have such a power, and are now exercising it.
Mr. SHERMAN. Unless some rule be expressly given, none will exist under the new system.
Mr. ELLSWORTH. Though the contracts of Congress will be binding, there will be no rule for executing them on the states; and one ought to be provided.
Mr. SHERMAN withdrew his motion, to make way for one of Mr. WILLIAMSON, to add to section 3,—
"By this rule the several quotas of the states shall be determined, in settling the expenses of the late war."
Mr. CARROLL brought into view the difficulty that might arise on this subject from the establishment of the Constitution as intended, without the unanimous consent of the states.
Mr. Williamson's motion was postponed, nem. con.
Article 6, sect. 12, which had been postponed on the 15th of August, was now called for by Col. MASON, who wished to know how the proposed amendment, as to money bills, would be decided, before he agreed to any further points.
Mr. GERRY'S motion of yesterday, "that, previous to a census, direct taxation be proportioned on the states according to the number of representatives," was taken up. He observed, that the principal acts of government would probably take place within that period; and it was but reasonable that the states should pay in proportion to their share in them.
Mr. ELLSWORTH thought such a rule unjust. There was a
