Jump to content

Page:Deeming v Pesutto (No 3) (2024, FCA).pdf/3

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.


Riley v Sivier [2022] EWHC 2891 (KB); [2023] EMLR 6

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 550; (2018) 359 ALR 564

Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corp (No 3) (2023) 303 FCR 372

Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corp [2023] FCA 38

Stead v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 15; (2021) 387 ALR 123

Stocker v Stocker [2020] AC 593

Sutcliffe v Pressdram Ltd [1991] 1 QB 153

Television New Zealand Ltd v Prebble [1993] 3 NZLR 513

Triggell v Pheeney (1951) 82 CLR 497

V'landys v Australian Broadcasting Corp [2023] FCAFC 80

Wilson v Mendelsohn [2024] EWHC 821 (KB)

Wood v Cox (1888) 4 TLR 652 at 656

Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 849
Date of last submission/s: 4 November 2024
Date of hearing 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 30 September 2024 and 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 14, 22, 23 and 24 October 2024
Counsel for the Applicant: S Chrysanthou SC with B Dean
Solicitor for the Applicant: Giles George
Counsel for the Respondent: M J Collins AM KC with T J Mullen, H Jager and D Dexter
Solicitor for the Respondent: MinterEllison

Deeming v Pesutto (No 3) [2024] FCA 1430