128 my&LLxrd, rrY. [Boo? I. CHAPTER I�. INFALLIBILITY. I. ST,?TZUmw'r Or THzI? Doc'T?tNE. Roman C?c? qua. ?fi ?. It b ? ?t ?t.--H. THEa Paoors fox ZT E?D. l. C? tion o; ? 2xM b?t M up?fi it; (1.) Ma?. x?, 18, ??; (t) Mutt. x?, !?; (3.) ?t. ? ?; (4.) J? ?, 15, la; (5.) ? i?? ? ?es c?M the? own ?; (6.) I T?. i?, la: 2. %e?_? ?mm ? ? of ?ib? w d?Me c?v?i?, c?side?; (1.) ? m?t w?M ?e men ? j? of what O? ?ht w do; (?.) It wouM tht ?1 m? a? hfgl?le; (3.) The Jewish chmh hd no such ?ide; (4.) A?- i? to ?s ?ent ?u rout ?t bye e?; (5.) It ? suppro ? ? j? must e?t in 2m? ? cidl mm; (6.) Such a j? is u??; (7.) Nor c?M he ? con?ve?; (8.) T? b no a?lu? ? for de2?'? al] cont?ve?; (?.) ? we? ?o? h ? a?d?' ?: 3. %e? men? ?m F?.--IH. OmNioNE or ?is CATHOLICS ON ?S S?AT Ex? or I?iLMBtL?. 1. ?y ?er h ?e? sentim? ?? i? extent: S. ?om s?. ?n? of ?e J?i?. Pig?us ?. ?io? of ?e ?. Of ?e Human Jeui?. Of ?l?r: a. F?r THE POPE. 1. P? bye con?ic? ?: 2. ?me bye ?en heretics. Lbg?. H?' . ?me ? ? of simony: ?. ?e ? ?1? ?ty: 4. ?m ?M u?-?: 5. ?m ? ?y ?o?: 6. ? or i GB? Co?ctn. 1. It b dis? wht b ? ?n? co?cfi: 2. bye d?M? ?t ?. ? ?u?fi of Nice h ?5, a? of Eph? ? ?1, ?t?n? on ?? ?. ?e?ou? of ?ic? in ? ?S? ?? ?e c? of Sc?uM. ??!e in 7? ? ? Co?fi of Nice on ?. ? ht ?u? of Nic? sixth ? ?t ? ? ??.--?. IVALLIJILI? Or i PoPI IND COUNCIL. 1. Trio ?ot ?e m ?!e: ?. ? ?u? of Cons?e ?d Buff m ?nst ? ? ?: S. ?M? II. h !1? ?n? ? ? ? M m?n 4. ?e h? III., in 1179, ? ?g?uM on ?u?n: 5. ?e? ?., 121? ? ? ?d ?e ?tive chu?h on ??u?n: 6. ?m ?t ? ? t? Mm??er of the ?: 7. ? C?fi of ?nt iraif, ? ?t ?g?u?.?VH. INFALLm?L?TY Or THE C?tcs OF ?Z, Um?B?SAL C?tcs. 1. Not in ? chumh ?usive: ?. Nor in the Chu?h of R?, es abe teaches false doctrines: 3. It is involved in perplexity: 4. Inl?lh'bility of the Protestant rule.--�III. ABOUMEIFrs AOAIWST IN)'ALLIBILITY. 1. It? tide, at best, is doubtful: S. The primitive churcbes did_ not pretend to it: 8. By it men are pre- vented from exe?ing their re?soa: 4. It depends on s false theory: 8. It produces error tud sin: 6. It fti18 to eccomi?lish wht ?t proposes. It does not decide conuo- vetolee, nor .exphin Scripture: 7. It presents greater difficulties dun the Protestant plan: 8. Their plan would require Ell men to be infallible: 9. It abuts the door aguinst reformation. I. THE I?,atin Church, and those in communion with her, claim for themselves the high prerogative of infallibility in doctrine and rules of' morality'. They say that this prerogative was given by Christ to the church, or Catholic Church, and that they are that church. They also pronounce all other churches as sunk in the most pernicious errors. "But as this one church, because governed by the Holy Ghost, cannot err in faith and morels, it necessarily follows that all other societies arrogaiin? to themselves the name of church, because guided by the spirit of darkness, are sunk in the most pernicious errors, both doctrinal and moral. "�s virtually includes the infallibilit? of the pope. In- deed, the following decision of the Council of Florence, on the lJth
- C?tochism of tho Camnml e? Treut, p. tOO.
l
�
