19 (1.) It is im? 34g Dr. Clarke quoted (g.) It is foolish and impious 346, 347 (3.) Beilarmlne's argument co?- aide red 347 (4.) Faith only is required to justification 34? (&) Chmt is the propitiation (a.) In the Scriptam ?zamp/e? of pa-don, hara? ?tisfaction is omitted 347 and venial sins tenRs to iramorn- Bishop H-y cited 348 (1.) Sins d?fer in nml?tude 348 ($.) Yet all sin closer?es damna- tion 348 (s.). No geed mancan indulge in sm 349 ?. Their distinction between mortal and venial sins leeds to an unholy he?,rt, and a wicked life 349, 350 9. It is abstmt 10. It leads to endless in determining cases of conscience 350 11. It is worse when applied to iS. It does away the gnmt evil of sin 351 13. It maltos repentance and amend- ment of life imperfect and fabe 351, 14. It fosters a disposition to commit one whole kind of sins 352 I�hey teach that "one man may satisf? for another" 352 According to Scriptore no man can satisfy for hinmelf 353. The mischievous results of the contrary to this ehown by Bishop Taylor 3?3, 354 1?. A.ad that the opinion of one ?,e gr&v8 doctor can nmko a matter ?erob? The doctrine of prob?ility Bishop Taylor quoted 354-356 Paechal cited, who preeents the doctrinos of the Jem?t? ont!? topic 356-359 17. Their penances form no adequate rt?'?st? or ? on sin 359 The kimb ofponsnem used prove this 359 They ab?mdly maim prayer penance U?!?ne? of mint of their ? cited 380?62 16. Teetimony of the ? on this subject 362 Tha s?nsz of T?t?Ili?, Gypnan, Ambrose, end &u&?ine, on mtisfaction The apostolic fathem to 5e pie= ferred to them 863 Clement cited 388 Jerome quoted ? lsodore 363 Augustine 863 Second Council of Chalons in 813 363 Some ]??:)xnan Catholics ackn?* ledge that penancos in their church are different from those mentioned in the pr?t?ve church 364 Du Pin cked 364 Ikns cited 364 CHAPTER XlI. POltO,ST0uy ?J6 I. $tatonent of ? ? 1. Introductory remark ?. Their authors cited Pius IVth's croed 966 Dens ?ouncil of Trent 966 The Roman Catechism 387 The Douay Catechism 357 Caution of the P?man Cate= chism 367 3. Enumeration of the points embra- ced in the forego'rag quotations 367 1. Some Roman Catholics allow it is not supported by Scripturo 358 I. Not proved 5y Isaiah xtii, 14 368 �Nor Matt. v, ?-?, ?6 358, 866 4. Nor Matt. xii, 3? ?69, 370 5. Nor 5y Psalm xii, l?i Mal. xvi, 27, ?c. 37O, 6. Nor I C?. iii, 12-15 371 7. Nor 1 Peter '? 18-?0 37?, 373 1. edBishop Hay'a argument answer- 878, 374 !ee?. 374 3. D?. A. Clarke cited 874, 375 4. Argument from the heathen poet? considered 375, 376 1. ?Only two characters a?e mention- 376 2. The thief on the cro? $76 3. C?e of the rich man and lmsaroe 376 4. Rev. xiv, 13 377 ?. ]VLmy texte are inco?t with it 377 �It is incona?tent with jostJ?catJ0n by f-?th a77 demptim o? ? 37T 1 oi?iti?c? ?,,, G OOc?[C
�
