?tl?P. I�.] TRANSUSS?ANTIAT!ON. ? the bread and wine to be the ?-t'ament, s/g?, type, and fma?,? of the ? and M? of G?st. The fa?e?, ?th Sc6pture, call ?e by the na? of ? ? (6.) ?e fathe? 8?ak more t?n i8 a?ow? to be literally true by eider side, ?d ?eretore d?l?e and force u?n us a sense of their word8 ?erent f? ?e Roman ?atholic ?te?re?tion. Such are the wo? of St. ?h?smm: "Thou 8seat ?m, thou ?uchest him, thou e?st ?m, ?d thy mn?e is m?e bl?y by ?s ?mi?ble bl?d; thy ?eth are f?tened ? his flesh, thy teeth are made red wi& his bl?. ? And &e author of ?e ?k De Cmnl Domini, at?buted to St. Cyprian: "We stick close to the 'cwss, we ?ck ?s bl?, and f?n our ton?es between the ve? wounds of the Redeemer." (7.) It is v?n M ?le? ?e wo?s of the fakers w?ch spe? of con,mien of bread into Ch?st's ?y or flesh, and of ?e wine ?8 b]?; since they say ?e same thing of ?, ?t we ? ?ed ? C?'s flesh and bl?. So St. C?wm: "He reduces in? the same m?s, ?d in ve? deed m?es ? w be his ?y."y M?ny such ?smnce8 might be ?ven. (8.) ?a?ver the fa?em 8? of the eucha?st, they ? ?e same ? of the o?er sacrament, and of the ?t?s of the ch?ch. C? of Ale?d?a says: "As the bre? of th? euchadM, ?er t? in?ation of ?e Holy Gh? is no longer co?on bre?, but it h ?e ?y of C?t, so ?is holy oin?ent is no longer mere ?d comm? o?tment." St. C?smm says: "The mble or ? is ? &e m?- get h which Christ w? l?d." St. Ambwse, s?ng of the bapfis?! ?m, *?s, "Na?m mutad per ?ne?cfionem." "The na? of them is ch?ged by ble?ing."? Au? a?8 that "we are made ?kers of ?e ?y and bl? of Christ, when ? baptism we m?e membe? of C?st; and ?e not estranged from ?e feHo?hip of t?t b? and c?ice, although we die before we e? t?t bre? and drink ?at cup."? "T?mur in ?sione Delhi ;" "We are b?fi?d into the p?sion of our Lo?," says Te?ulli?.[ The testimonies w?ch we will ?lege fwm the ancient fa?em ?t ?ansubs?afion wi? ?, 1. A?a?ve of the ?tes?t sere, ? exclusive to 'the Roman Catholic dora. 2. We my eas?y su? ?e ?at ?e fathem. would ?o hy?r?los, but never t?t w?ch w?ld undervalue ?e sac?ment. (l.) St. I?atius says: "Bre?ng oNE ?d the SA?E DREAD, w?ch b ?e medicine of immo?ity, our antidote t?t we sho?d not ?e, but ?ve for ever in Christ Jes?.? A?in: "?erefore, pu?g on mee?ess, renew youselves in f?, t?t is, ?e flesh of ?e ?; and in charity, that is, ?e bl?d of Jesus Christ? �ere, c?y, there is no ?d for t?nsubst?fia?on. S?aking of ce? here?cs he says: "They a?n from ?e euch? and fmm ?e pubic ?c?, became they confess not the eucha?t m be the flesh of Sa?o? Jesus C?st, w?ch suffe?d for o? si?, ?d w?ch the Fa- Hem. 83 in 8. Matt. Horn. 60 and 6 8d Antioch. Horn. 38 in 8. Matt., mi Obr. Const. ?: Lib. iv, de 8m:r. Ad infantes spud Bedam in I Cor. x, 1?. do Bap. See Faber'a Dif. of Rorn., p. 80, and the authorities quote?, �piat. to the his. ?0, Abp. Wake'a Engl/eh traadatiou. Ephe, hns,
- Epbt. to the Traitis,m, No. 8.
�
