DELINEATION OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM. BOOK I. ON THE RULE OF FAITH. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTIONsSTANDARDS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC FAITH. L IHTHOVUCTOHY RHMAitKS. t. Iramutability in doctrine the bo?t of ?e Chu?h Of ?me. Butler qu?d: 2. Eve? ?y of men s?uld ? hea? m?t?g their own cm?; but ?ey ?uld not ? ?it?d ? mimpre?nt them?!ves: 3. Many �in? ?e v?u?y e? in the standard, of the Chuwh of Rome: 4. Enume?tioh of their ?a?s.?II. C?ssn ?D O?T? O? P?u? IV. 1. T? is ? ?knowled? standard: 2. T?timo? of t? from ?m?is?. ?. Milner, Charl? Butler, Dr. Doyle, ci?d: ?. It is both a ?eed ? o?tA: 4. The cre? quot?: 5. Rem?ks on the cr?.--IIL E?,scoP? O?Ta or ALLSaL?SO= ? ?= POPS. 1. Brief count of the ?th: 2. A ?teml tm?lati? of ? oath: 3. Rem?ks on the oa?.-- IV. CATHCHISM or wU ?UNClL Or TRENT.--V. OENSaAL C?NO1Ls.--VI. B?L?. 1. T? ? ?lv? into the inf?lib?ity o? ?e Po?: 2. ?iews of their d? on th/s ?Mt. ?llarmine cit?: 3. lndic? ofpro?bit? ?o?: 4. Coll?tion? of the ?1? incomple?.--?II. L?mc? BooKs. 1. Enume?tion of ?cm: 2. The ?: 3. The ?i?,?: 4. The R?n P?ai: 5. Th? ?n R?tu?: X. ANCIENT FtTHE?.--XI. Ko?s CATHOLIC WRlTZR8. 1. Ume?nty of t?ir tutho?ty: 2. Are of ?t w?ht in ?tte? Of p?cfice: 3. A? e?n of doct?ne: 4. VEnous c?s of divin? amo? them.?XII. GENBtAL ?Z?Ri8 ?SO&RDO. 1. SU? Of ?e fom?mg h?ds: 2. Evnio? of their write?. P?i- live air with w?h ? b?ct ?e? own ?ple. U?e?inty 8t?h? W their d?mro when ?nM? with Pmt?: 3. ?eir u? s?8 ? still in fore: 4. 0bj?t of ?e p?t wo? I. INTEODUCTORY REMARKS. 1. MR. BUTLEr, ?e author of the ?k of ?e Roman Ch?ch, decl?, "It is most t?e that the Roman Catho?cs ?eve the doct?nes of their church M be unc?geable; ?d that it is ? ten? of their creed, ? wh? theb faith ever h? ?en, such k w? from tht? behar ,, such it now is, ?d such it ever wfil be." Immu?biliw docwin is the ?t of the Ch?ch d Rome. If t?s high claim codd be m? ?ined, ? men ought M ?w M her decisions. But it can be shown t?t no claim can be wo?e folded; for it can ? proved th? she h? varied ?m h?seK, from ?e printire chur&, and from Scripture. An e?nafion of her pretensio? is the desi? d ?e fol- lowing ?g?. 2. It h the pfi?ege of eve? ?n m be he?d respecting ? cre? or principles. ?e 8?e may be a?ed of eve? b?y of men. T?s is co?nly the most co?ect way of ?eafing o? fellows. Indeed eve? Proreset w? re,fly a?ee with ML Butler, "?t no ?tdne shodd ? ?c?bed ? the ?m? C?ho?cs as s ?dy, except 8u& n i8 an 1
�
