Cn?. XIV.] zx??tm,- m?m. mx. 429 &dg, t? m/mtoer s/ns tAou Aast corem/tied /? ?/gAt, &c., ?d in like runner by the other member. The minister of t?s sacrament is a p?est; but the e?ect is the bering o? ?e mind,.and, as far ? is fit, the ?dy ?so. Conc?ing this sac?ment ?e a?tle St. James sa?, chap. v, ve?es 14, 15,' Is any in? ?ng you? let ?m send �e presbyte? of the church, ?d let them pray ?or h?, anointing him wi? o? in ?e n?e o? ?e ?, and ?e p?yer of ? w?l save ?e ?ck, and ?e Lo? wi? re?eve ?m; and ff he be in sins, they will for?ven him.' '? 2. The (ollo?n? a? the decrees ?d canons of the Counc? T?nt respecting extreme unction; the decree i8 divided inM three chapel, the 8?bstance of w?ch i8 confined in the ?t, ? follows: "Of t? Inst?uti? ? t? ?a? ? Eztr? U?. "?is sacred unction of the sick w? instituted ? a ?e and pm?r sacrament of the New Testament, by C?st Jes? our ?; ?ing in,mated by M?k, (vi, 13,) and ?terward recommended and pubicbed to the faithf? by James the a?stle, bwther of our ?. ' Is ?y man,' sMth he, ' sick among you ? let him bring ? the pfies? of the church, and let ?em pray over ?m, anoint?g ? wi? o? in ?e name of the Lord; and the p?yer of t?ith shall ?ve the sick man; and the ?rd s?11 raise him up; and if he be in sins, they ?1 be for?ven ?m,' James v, 14, 15. In w?ch wo?s, ? the ch?ch h? le?ed by a?mlicM t?tion, handed down from age m age, he teaches ?e ma? ter, fo?, proper minister, and effect of ?s salum? sac?mefit. For the church unde?tands the matter of the sacrament to be the oH blessM by the bishop; the unction most fifty representing ?e ?ce of ?e Holy Spirit, wherewith the soul of the sick m? is invisibly ?o?d. The form is contained in the words of ?nistmtion." The second chapter defines the effect, viz.: "And the p?yer of fM? shall save the sick man; and the Lo? sh? raise ? up; and if he in sins, they shall be for?ven him."The thi? defines ?e administ?wrs of this sac?ment, bishops ?d pfiestsj and ?e ?r t?e, when near unto death. The decree w? ?compa?ed ? the follow- ing canons: "C? 1. Whoever shall affirm ?at e?eme unction is not ?ly and properly a sacrament, instituted by C?t our ?, and published by the blessed apostle James, but only a ceremony received from fakers, or a human invention, let him ? accuse. "2. Whoever shMl affi? that the ?d unction of lhe sick doe8 ?fer ?ce, nor for?ve sin, nor relieve ?e sick; but t? i? ?wer �Quinturn ?c?entum ?t extmma u?tio, cuju, m?ria ?t oleum ohv? ? ep? c?m ?n?ictum: h? ?ramentum, nisi iago de cujus mo? timetur, d? non debet; qui in his l?is un?endus eat: in ?uhs proper ?sum; m auribus proper au- diturn; in na?bus propter odo?tum; in om proper ?stum vd I?utio?m; in ma?b? ?r ?ctum; ? ?ibus proper ?um; in ?nibus pmpter de!?m?onem ibidem v?entem. Fo?a hujus sacramenti eat h?: P? ?m ?m et similiter in allis membris. Minis?r hujus ?men? m sace?: e?Ktus mmtis sana6o, et, in quantum exp?ih iDius eaam ?m. ? ? ?m? quit B. J?o?s a?s?lus, cap. v, yet. 14 et 15. InCur qu?i? ?o? ? ?r? ecclts?, et ?o,t ?up? ? un?en? eum oleo in nomi? Delhi, et ?'?' ?ivabit infixurn, et allevinbit onto ?; et, ?i in ?ca? sik dimit?nmr ?, vol. vii, ? 5.
�
