KOLA. neighbouring Capua (Pol. ii. 17); though it is most probable that the city already existed from an earlier period. The statement of Solinus that it was founded by the Tyrians is clearly erroneous: perhaps, as sugg;ested by Niebuhr, we should read " a Tyrrhenis" for " a Tyriis." (Solin. 2. § 16; Niebuhr, vol. i. p. 74, note 235.) We have no account of the manner in which Nola afterwards passed into the hands of the Samnites; but there can be little doubt that it speedily followed in this respect the fate of Capua [Capua] ; and it is certain that it was, at the time of the first wars of the Romans in this part of Italy, a Campanian city, occupied by an O.scan people, in close alliance ^vith the Samnites. (Liv. viii. 23.) Dionysius also intimates clearly that the inhabitants were not at this period, like the Neapolitans, a Greek people, though he tells us that they were much at- taclicd to the Greeks and their institutions. (Dionys. Fr. XV. 5. p. 231,5. R.) We may probably infer from the above statements, that Nola was originally an Ausonian or Oscan town, and subsequently occupied by the Etruscans, in whose hands it appears to have remained, like Capua, until it was conquered by the Samnites, who subse- quently assumed the name of Campanians, about B. c. 440. The evidence in favour of its having ever received a Greek colony is very slight, and is certainly outweighed by the contrary testimony of Hecataeus, as well as by the silence of all other Greek writers. The circumstance that its coins (none of which are of early date) have uniformly Greek in- scriptions (as in the one figured below), may be sufficiently accounted for by that attachment to the Greeks, which is mentioned by Dionysius as charac- terising the inhabitants. (Dionys. /. c.) The first mention of Nola in history occurs in n. c. 328, just before the beginning of the Second Samnite War, when the Greek cities of Palaepolis and Neapolis having rashly pr jvoked the hostility of Rome, the Nolans sent to their assistance a body of 2000 troops, at the same time that the Samnites furnished an auxiliary force of twice that amount. (Liv. viii. 23.) But their efforts were frustrated by disaffection among the Palaepolitans ; and the Nolans retired from the city on finding it betrayed into the hands of the Romans. {Ih. 25, 26.) Notwithstand- ing the provocation thus given, it was long before tiie Romans were at leisure to avenge themselves on Nola; and it was not till B.C. 313 that they laid siege to that city, which fell into their hands after but a short resistance. (M is. 28.) It appears certain that it continued from this period virtually subject to Rome, though enjoying, it would seem, the privi- leged condition of an allied city (Liv. xxiii. 44; Festus, s. V. Municipium, p. 1 27) ; but we do not meet with any subsequent notice of it in history till the Second Punic War, when it was distinguished for its fidelity to the Roman cause, and for its successful resistance to the arms of Hannibal. That general, after making himself master of Capua in k. c. 216, hoped to reduce Nola in like manner by the co- operation of a party within the walls. But though the lower people in the city were ready to invite the Carthaginian general, the senate and nobles were faithful to the alliance of Rome, and sent in all haste to the praetor Marcellus, who threw himself into the city with a considerable force. Hannibal in conse- quence withdrew from before the walls; but shortly after, having taken Nuceria, he renewed the attempt utjon Nola, and continued to threaten the city for some time, until Marcellus, by a sudden sally, in- NOLA. 443 fiieted upon him considerable loss, and led him to abandon the enterprise (Liv. xxiii. 14 — 17; Pint. A[arc. 10, 11; Eutrop. iii. 12; Flor. ii. 6. § 29.) The advantage thus obtained, though inconsiderable in itself, was of importance in restoring the spirits of the Romans, which had been almost crushed by re- peated defeats, and was in con.sequence magnified into a great victory. (Liv. I. c; Sil. Ital. xii. 270 — 280.) The next year (b. c. 215) Hannibal again attempted to make himself master of Nola, to which he was encouraged by fresh overtures from the de- mocratic party within the city; but he was again anticipated by the vigilance of Marcellus, and, having encamped in the neighbourhood of the town, with a view to a more regular siege, was attacked and de- feated by the Roman general (Liv. xxiii. 39, 42 — 46; Plut. Marc. 12.) A third attempt, in the fol- lowing year, was not more successful; and by these successive defences the city earned the praise be- stowed on it by Silius Italicus, who calls it " Poeno non pervia Nola." (Sil. Ital. viii. 534.) Nola again bears a conspicuous part in the Social War. At the outbreak of that contest (b. c. 90) it was protected, as a place of importance from its proximity to the Samnite frontier, by a Roman gar- rison of 2000 men, under the command of the praetor L. Postumius, but was betrayed into the hands of the Samnite leader C. Papius, and became from thenceforth one of the chief strongholds of the Sam- nites and their allies in this part of Italy. (Liv. Epit. Ixxiii. ; Appian, B. C. i. 42.) Thus we find it in the following year (b. c. 89) affording shelter to the shattered remains of the army of L. Cluentius, after its defeat by Sulla (Appian, I. c. 50); and even after the greater part of the allied nations had made peace with Rome, Nola still held out; and a Roman army was still occupied in the siege of the city, when the civil war first broke out between Marius and Sulla. (Veil. Pat. ii. 17, 18; Diod. xxxvii. Exc. Phot, p. 540.) The new turn thus given to aft'airs for a while retarded its fall: the Samnites who were de- fending Nola joined the party of Marius and Ciima; and it was not till after the final triumph of Sulla, and the total destruction of the Samnite power, that the dictator was able to make himself master of the refractory city. (Liv. Epit. Ixxxix.) We cannot doubt that it was severely punished : we learn that its fertile territory was divided by Sulla among his victorious soldiers {Lib. Colon, p. 236), and the old inhabitants probably altogether expelled. It is re- markable that it is termed a Colonia before the out- break of this war (Liv. Epit. Ixxiii.); but this is probably a mistake. No other author mentions it as such, and its existence as a municipium, retaining its own institutions and the use of the Oscan Language, is distinctly attested at a period long subsequent to the Second Punic War, by a remarkable inscription still extant. (},lommsen,UnterJial.Dial. p. 125.) It afterwards received a second colony under Augustus, and a tliird under Vespasian ; hence Pliny enumerates it among the Coloniae of Campania, and we find it in inscriptions as late as the time of Diocletian, bearing the titles of " Colonia Felix Augusta Nolana." (Lib. Colon. I. c; Plin. iii. 5. s. 9; Zumpt, de Colon, pp. 254, 350; Gruter, Inscr. p. 473. 9, p. 1085. 14.) It was at Nola that Augustus died, on his return from Beneventum, whitlier he had accompanied Tiberius a. d. 14; and from thence to Bovillae his funeral procession was attended by the senators of the cities through which it passed. (Suet. Aug. 98; Dion Cass. Ivi. 29, 31 ; Tac. Ann. i. 5; Veil. Pat. ii.
