N.B.— f.e. stands for from end and l.l. for last line
| Page | Col. | Line | |
| 5 6 |
ii i |
14 f.e. 3 f.e. 3 33 |
Garnett, John: for Lynam read Burdy |
| 13 | ii | 14 f.e. | Garraway, Sir Henry: for when Garraway read It is commonly stated in error that then Garraway |
| 9 f.e. | after acclamation, insert Garraway's alleged speech was a tract written by Hyde for publication. | ||
| 7 f.e. | for On his way home he read The writer of the published oration fancifully asserted that Garraway on his way home | ||
| 14 | ii | 44-45 | Garrett, Jeremiah L.: for Christ's College read Christ's Hospital |
| 30 | i | 3 f.e. | Garter, Bernard: for Braystocke read Brigstocke |
| 35 | i | 15 | Gascoigne, Sir Bernard: for 17 Oct. read 24 Sept. |
| 16-17 | for thirty-one years at the rent of 207. read forty-four years at the rent of 20l. (Sloane MS. 856, f. 8). | ||
| ii | 31 | for Innsbruck read Austria | |
| 38 | ii | 26 | Gascoigne, George: for Gaston read Gascoigne (not Gaston, as printed in the Calendar) |
| 28-32 | for But the identity of Gaston . . . . librarians assigned to Gascoigne read There is little doubt that Gascoigne was the author of | ||
| 23-19 f.e. | for All the best evidence . . . . in pious exercises, read The 'Spoyle' was reprinted in Mr. Arber's 'English Garner,' vol. viii. | ||
| 44 | i | 21 | Gascoigne, Sir Thomas: for (1596? read (1598? |
| 22 | for 1596 read 1593 | ||
| 46 | ii | 39 | Gascoigne, Sir William: for Harwood read Harewood |
| 50 | ii | 16 | Gaskell, Elizabeth C.: for her life read her married life |
| 51 | ii | 8 | for 1865, &c.) read in 'Household Words,' 1855, &c.) |
| 10 | for both 1865. read both of which appeared in 'Household Words,' the first in 1853 and the second in 1855. | ||
| 56 | ii | 27 | Gassiot, John P.: for he endowed read he helped to endow |
| 15 f.e. | after Gassiot insert who was elected a fellow of the society, | ||
| 62 | i | 39 | Gataker, Thomas: for Goulson read Goulston |
| 83 | i | 15 | Gawler, George: after rank of colonel, insert In 1833 he contributed to 'The United Service Journal,' part ii., a paper called 'The Crisis and Close of the Action at Waterloo, by an Eye-witness,' which was reissued as a pamphlet (Dublin, 1833) and caused great controversy. Gawler contended that his own regiment (the 52nd), supported by the rest of Adams's brigade, and not the guards, defeated Napoleon's final attack. Gawler defended his contention against Sir Hussey Vivian in 'The United Service Journal' for 1833, and was corroborated by W. Leeke in his 'Lord Seaton's Regiment at Waterloo,' 1866. |
133
