been appointed chancellor to the new archbishop, Richard of Dover. According to
Bale he was educated at Oxford. In 1177
he was elected to the abbacy of Peterborough,
and died in that office at Michaelmas, 1193.
His biographer, Swafham, gives him the character of one sufficiently learned, well versed
in monastic discipline, and having a thorough
knowledge of the world. Succeeding to an
abbot who had involved the monastery in
heavy debt, he began at once to fulfil the
part of an energetic reformer. He cleared
off the debts, redeemed the church plate and
other goods which had been pledgea, and recovered lands which had been alienated. On
one occasion he is said to have even appeared
in arms to enforce his claim. He was an
ardent builder. He completed a portion of
the nave of his church, built the great abbeygate and certain chapels, and was busy on
other works when death overtook him. He
stood well in favour with King Richard, at
whose coronation he was present ; and indeed,
if we are to believe Swafham, he was on
terms of unusual intimacy with the sovereign
('valde specialiter amicus et familiaris').
He used his opportunities well in securing
the rights and liberties of his house by royal
charters. He did not, however, as has been
stated by different writers, hold the appointment of vice-chancellor during Richard's
absence from England. The Benedict upon
whom that office was conferred during the
quarrel of Prince John with Chancellor Longchamp in 1191, was undoubtedly Benedict of
Sansetun, afterwards bishop of Rochester [see
Benet or Benedictus, Magister, d. 1226].
Swafham gives a considerable list of manuscripts which were transcribed and added to the monastic library by Benedict's orders. Most of them are biblical, theological, and law books; but among them occur also Seneca, Martial, Terence, and Claudian. His own literary work included a history of the passion and another of the miracles of Thomas Becket. Bearing in mind the probability of his having been a monk of Christ Church, Canterbury, it is not too much to suppose, with regard to these two works, that 'the former possibly, the latter certainly, was founded on his own knowledge as an eyewitness' (Stubbs's Introd. to Gesta Hen. II p. li). The 'History of the Miracles' has been edited by Canon Robertson in the 'Materials for the History of Thomas Becket' (Rolls Series), 1870. The History of the Passion' has only survived in fragments embodied in the work on Becket known as the 'Quadrilogus.' The work, however, with which Benedict's name is most prominently connected is the 'Gesta Henrici Secundi; but with the authorship of it he apparently had nothing to do. This chronicle is found in two early manuscripts of different recensions. The first (Cotton MS, Julius A. xi.) appears to have been transcribed from the original work while it was still passing through the author's hands. To it is prefixed a copy of the genealogy of Henry II written by Ailred of Rievaulx, at the head of which appears the title, intended to cover both genealogy and chronicle. 'Gesta Henrici II Benedicti abbatis.' The occurrence of this title has been the cause of the ascription of the work to Benedict. It is, however, explained by a passage in Swafham; for there can be little doubt that the manuscript is the identical volume ('Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi et Genealogia ejus') which that writer tells us was transcribed by Benedict's orders together with the other manuscripts which he added to the library. Independently of this explanation, also, the last two words of the title may be taken to mean simply 'the gift of Benedict the abbot.' Who was the real author of the 'Gesta' is not known. Professor Stubbs has suggested that the work may be, in an altered form, the lost 'Tricolumnis of Richard Fitz-Neal, the author of the 'Dialogus de Scaccario.'
[Roberti Swaphami Historia Cœnobii Burgensis, printed in the Historise Anglicanae Scriptores varii, ed. Sparke, 1723; Gesta Henrici II, ed. Hearne, 1735, and Stubbs (Rolls Series), 1867; Hardy's Descriptive Catalogue of Materials for English History (Rolls Series), vol. ii. 1865, pp. 340, 341, 493.]
BENEDICT BISCOP (628?–690), also called Biscop Baducing (Eddius, Vita Wilfridi c. 3), founder of monasteries at Wearmouth and Jarrow, was an Angle of noble
birth (Beda, v. 19, and Vita Abbat. i.), possibly of the royal race of the Lindisfari (Flor. Worc. Mon. Hist. Brit. 631 ). He became a 'minister' or thegn of Oswiu, king of Northumbria, who
bestowed land upon him. But in 653, being
then about twenty-five, he resolved to abandon the world and set out for Rome. At
Canterbury he fell in with Wilfrith, who was
about six years younger than himself and desired to visit Rome. The two travelled together as far as Lyons, where Wilfrith tarried,
and Benedict went on to Rome. After sojourning some years there he returned to
Northumbria, where he strove to introduce
the Roman system of ecclesiastical life. About
665 he started on a second visit to Rome.
Alchfrith, the son of king Oswiu, wished to
accompany him, but was forbidden by his
father (Beda, V, Abb. c. 2). After sending
some months in Rome, Benedict retired for
two years to the monastery of Lerins (an
