Cite as 774 F.2d 1371 (1985)
whether he gave proper reasons for rejecting their opinions and the testimony of her vocational rehabilitation counselor.
CONCLUSION
We hold that the “severity regulation,” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(c) (1985), is inconsistent with the provisions of the Social Security Act and is therefore invalid. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the district court and remand with instructions that the Secretary reevaluate Yuckert’s claim without reference to the severity regulation, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(c) (1985).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DOLLAR RENT A CAR OF WASHINGTON, INC.; Dollar Rent a Car of Cleveland, Inc.; and Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation; the Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut, a corporation; and Constitution State Management Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellants.
VIKING REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation; the Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut, a corporation; and Constitution State Management Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 84–6199, 84–6454.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 4, 1984.
Decided Oct. 24, 1985.
