LOOSESTRIFE, in botany, the common name of Lysimachia vulgaris, an erect plant, 2 to 4 ft. high, common on river banks in England; the branched stem bears tapering leaves in pairs or whorls, and terminal panicles of rather large deep yellow flowers. It is a member of the primrose family. L. nemorum, yellow pimpernel, or wood loosestrife, a low-growing plant with slender spreading stem, and somewhat similar yellow flowers standing singly in the leaf-axils, is frequent in copses. L. Nummularia is the well-known creeping jenny or money-wort, a larger plant with widely creeping stem, pairs of shining leaves and large solitary yellow flowers; it is found on banks of rivers and damp woods, and is a common rockery plant. Purple loosestrife, Lythrum Salicaria, belongs to a different family, Lythraceae. It is a handsome plant growing 2 to 6 ft. high on river banks and ditches, with a branched angled stem bearing whorls of narrow pointed stalkless leaves and ending in tall tapering spikes of beautiful rose-purple flowers. The flowers are trimorphic, that is to say, exist in three forms which differ in the relative length of the styles and stamens and are known as long-styled, mid-styled and short-styled forms respectively; the size and colour of the pollen also differ. These differences play an important part in the pollination of the flower.
LOOT, plunder or spoil taken from an enemy in war, especially
the indiscriminate plunder taken by the victor after the capture
of a city. The word came into English from India. It is adapted
from the Hindi lūt, which is either from Sanskrit luṇṭ, to rob,
plunder, or lōtra, lōptra, booty.
LOPES, FERNÃO (1380?–1459?), the patriarch of Portuguese
historians, was appointed keeper of the royal archives, then
housed in the castle of St George in Lisbon, by King John I.
in November 1418. He acted as private secretary to the Infants
D. Duarte and D. Fernando, and when the former ascended the
throne he charged Lopes, by letter of the 19th of March 1434,
with the work of “putting into chronicles the stories of the kings
of old time as well as the great and lofty actions of the most
virtuous king my lord and father” (John I.). The form of the
appointment marked its limits, and is a sufficient reply to those
modern critics who have censured Lopes for partiality. Notwithstanding
his official title of chief chronicler of the realm,
he was the king’s man (Vassallo del Rei), and received his salary
from the royal treasury. King Alphonso V. confirmed him in
his post by letter of the 3rd of June 1449, and in 1454, after
thirty-six years’ service in the archives and twenty as chronicler,
he resigned in favour of Gomez Eannes de Azurara. The latter
pays a tribute to his predecessor as “a notable person, a man of
rare knowledge and great authority,” and the modern historian
Herculano says, “there is not only history in the chronicles of
Fernão Lopes, there is poetry and drama as well; there is the
middle age with its faith, its enthusiasm, its love of glory.”
Lopes has been called the Portuguese Froissart, and that rare
gift, the power of making their subjects live, is common to the
two writers; indeed, had the former written in a better-known
language, there can be little doubt that the general opinion of
critics would have confirmed that of Robert Southey, who called
Lopes “beyond all comparison the best chronicler of any age
or nation.” Lopes was the first to put in order the stories of the
earlier Portuguese monarchs, and he composed a general chronicle
of the kingdom, which, though it never appeared under his name,
almost certainly served as a foundation for the chronicles of Ruy de Pina
(q.v.). Lopes prepared himself for his work with care
and diligence, as he tells us, not only by wide reading of books
in different languages, but also by a study of the archives belonging
to municipalities, monasteries and churches, both in
Portugal and Spain. He is usually a trustworthy guide in facts,
and charms the reader by the naïve simplicity of his style.
His works that have come down are: (1) Chronica del Rei D. João I. de boa memoria, parts 1 and 2 (Lisbon, 1644). The third part relating the capture of Ceuta was added by Azurara. A corrected text of the chronicle has been issued by instalments in the Archivo Historico Portuguez. (2) “Chronica do senhor rei D. Pedro I.,” in vol. iv. of the Colleccão de Livros Ineditos da Historia Portugueza, published by the Academy of Sciences (Lisbon, 1816); a much better text than that published by Father Bayão in his edition of the same chronicle (Lisbon, 1760). (3) Chronica do senhor rei D. Fernando published in the same volume and collection. The British Museum has some important 16th-century MSS. of the chronicles.
See Damião de Goes, Chronica del Rei Dom Manoel, part iv. ch. 38; Araãgo Morato, introduction to vol. iv. of the above collection; Herculano, Opusculos, vol. v. (E. Pr.)
LOPEZ, CARLOS ANTONIO (1790–1862), Paraguayan autocrat, was born at Asuncion on the 4th of November 1790, and was educated in the ecclesiastical seminary of that city. He attracted the hostility of the dictator, Francia, and he was forced to keep in hiding for several years. He acquired, however, so unusual a knowledge of law and governmental affairs that, on Francia’s death in 1840, he obtained an almost undisputed control of the Paraguayan state, which he maintained uninterruptedly until his death on the 10th of September 1862. He was successively secretary of the ruling military junta (1840–1841), one of the two consuls (1841–1844), and president with dictatorial powers (1844–1862) by successive elections for ten and three years, and in 1857 again for ten years, with power to nominate his own successor. Though nominally a president acting under a republican constitution, he ruled despotically. His government was in general directed with wise energy towards developing the material resources and strengthening the military power of the country. His jealousy of foreign approach several times involved him in diplomatic disputes with Brazil, England, and the United States, which nearly resulted in war, but each time he extricated himself by skilful evasions.
His eldest son, Francisco Solano Lopez (1826–1870), was born near Asuncion on the 24th of July 1826. When in his nineteenth year he was made commander-in-chief of the Paraguayan army, during the spasmodic hostilities then prevailing with the Argentine Republic. He was sent in 1853 as minister to England, France and Italy, and spent a year and a half in Europe. He purchased large quantities of arms and military supplies, together with several steamers, and organized a project for building a railroad and establishing a French colony in Paraguay. He also formed the acquaintance of Madame Lynch, an Irish adventuress of many talents and popular qualities, who became his mistress, and strongly influenced his later ambitious schemes. Returning to Paraguay, he became in 1855 minister of war, and on his father’s death in 1862 at once assumed the reins of government as vice-president, in accordance with a provision of his father’s will, and called a congress by which he was chosen president for ten years. In 1864, in his self-styled capacity of “protector of the equilibrium of the La Plata,” he demanded that Brazil should abandon her armed interference in a revolutionary struggle then in progress in Uruguay. No attention being paid to his demand, he seized a Brazilian merchant steamer in the harbour of Asuncion, and threw into prison the Brazilian governor of the province of Matto Grosso who was on board. In the following month (December 1864) he despatched a force to invade Matto Grosso, which seized and sacked its capital Cuyabá, and took possession of the province and its diamond mines. Lopez next sought to send an army to the relief of the Uruguayan president Aguirro against the revolutionary aspirant Flores, who was supported by Brazilian troops. The refusal of the Argentine president, Mitre, to allow this force to cross the intervening province of Corrientes, was seized upon by Lopez as an occasion for war with the Argentine Republic. A congress, hastily summoned, and composed of his own nominees, bestowed upon Lopez the title of marshal, with extraordinary war powers, and on April 13, 1865, he declared war, at the same time seizing two Argentine war-vessels in the bay of Corrientes, and on the next day occupied the town of Corrientes, instituted a provisional government of his Argentine partisans, and summarily announced the annexation to Paraguay of the provinces of Corrientes and Entre Rios. Meantime the party of Flores had been successful in Uruguay, and that state on April the 18th united with the Argentine Republic in a declaration of war on Paraguay. On the 1st of May Brazil joined these two states in a secret alliance, which stipulated that they should unitedly prosecute the war “until the existing government of Paraguay should be overthrown,”
