Page:EB1911 - Volume 18.djvu/643

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
614
MISSOURI COMPROMISE
  

immediate and unconditional emancipation they swept the state in November 1864. By the constitution of 1865 slavery was abolished outright.[1] The convention of 1861, by maintaining continuous government, had saved the state from anarchy and from reconstruction by the national power; but an ironclad test oath (it required denial of forty-five distinct offences) was provided, to be taken by all voters, state, county and municipal officers, lawyers, jurors, teachers and clergymen. Its attempted enforcement was a grave error of judgment, and was attended by great abuses, and it was finally held unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. The legislature, however, maintained its ends by registration laws that reduced to impotence the Democratic electorate. The Radical Republicans held control until 1870, when they were defeated by a combination of Liberal Republicans and Democrats,[2] and the test-oath and the rest of the intolerant legislation of the war period were swept away. In 1872, the Democrats gained substantial control, and after 1876 their power was established beyond challenge. The constitution of 1875 closed the war period with blanket amnesties. Though in politics habitually Democratic, Missouri has generally had a strong opposition party—Whig in antebellum days, and since the war, Republican—which in recent years has made political conditions increasingly unstable. This instability is shown in congressional and local rather than in general state elections. In 1908 a Republican governor was elected, the first for more than thirty years.

The Governors of Missouri since 1804 have been as follow:—
Territorial Period.
Party Affiliation. Service.
James Wilkinson Appointed 1805–1806
Joseph Brown (acting governor) 1806–1807
Frederick Bates (acting governor) 1807
Meriwether Lewis Appointed 1807–1809
Frederick Bates (acting governor) 1809–1810
Benjamin Howard Appointed 1810–1812
Frederick Bates (acting governor) 1812–1813
William Clark Appointed 1813–1820
State Period.
Alexander McNair Democrat 1820–1824[3]
Frederick Bates (died in office) ,, 1824–1825
Abraham J. Williams (acting governor)   1825
John Miller (special election to fill out term) Democrat 1825–1828
John Miller ,, 1828–1832
Daniel Dunklin (resigned office) ,, 1832–1836
Lilburn W. Boggs (acting governor)   1836
Lilburn W. Boggs Democrat 1836–1840
Thomas Reynolds (died in office) ,, 1840–1844
M. M. Marmaduke (acting governor)   1844
John C. Edwards Democrat 1844–1848
Austin A. King ,, 1848–1853
Sterling Price ,, 1853–1857
Trusten Polk (elected to United States Senate) ,, 1857
Hancock Jackson (acting governor)   1857
Robert M. Stewart (elected to serve out term) Democrat 1857–1861
Claiborne F. Jackson (deposed by state convention) ,, 1861
Hamilton R. Gamble (appointed by state convention;
 died in office), provisional governor
1861–1864
Willard P. Hall (Lieut.-governor by same power,
 acting provisional governor)
1864–1865
Thomas C. Fletcher Republican 1865–1869
Joseph W. McClurg ,, 1869–1871
B. Gratz Brown Liberal Republican
(and Democrat)
1871–1873
Silas Woodson ,, 1873–1875
Charles H. Hardin Democrat 1875–1877
John S. Phelps ,, 1877–1881
Thomas T. Crittenden ,, 1881–1885
John S. Marmaduke (died in office) ,, 1885–1887
Albert P. Morehouse (acting governor) 1887–1889
David R. Francis Democrat 1889–1893
William J. Stone ,, 1893–1897
Lon V. Stephens ,, 1897–1901
Alexander M. Dockerey ,, 1901–1905
Joseph W. Folk ,, 1905–1909
Herbert S. Hadley Republican 1909

Bibliography.—For Physiography: See Surface Features of Missouri (in Missouri Geological Survey Reports, vol. x., Jefferson City, 1896); publications of the State Bureau of Geology and Mines, including bulletins and reports of the Missouri Geological Survey (1853 seq.; new series, 15 vols., 1891–1904); publications of United States Geological Survey, particularly Bulletins 132, 213, 267, the 22nd Annual Report, part ii. pp. 23–227, &c.; and reports of state departments. On administration: the annual Official Manual of the State of Missouri (really private, Jefferson City); also F. N. Judson, Law and Practice of Taxation in Missouri (Columbia, 1900); M. S. Snow, Higher Education in Missouri (U.S. Bureau of Education, Washington, 1898). On History: Lucian Carr, Missouri (“American Commonwealths” Series, Boston, 1892); L. Houck, Spanish Régime in Missouri (3 vols., Chicago, 1910); T. L. Snead, The Fight for Missouri (New York, 1886); Wiley Britton, The Civil War on the Border (2 vols., New York, 1891–1899; 3rd ed. of vol. 1, revised, 1899); H. M. Chittenden, History of Early Steamboat Navigation on the Missouri River (2 vols., New York, 1903); W. B. Davis and D. S. Durrie, An Illustrated History of Missouri (St Louis, 1876); Encyclopedia of the History of Missouri . . . ed. by H. L. Conrad (6 vols., New York, St Louis, 1901).

MISSOURI COMPROMISE, an agreement (1820) between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States, involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the public territories. A bill to enable the people of Missouri to form a state government preliminary to admission into the Union came before the House of Representatives in Committee of the Whole, on the 13th of February 1819. An amendment offered by James Tallmadge (1778–1853) of New York, which provided that the further introduction of slaves into Missouri should be forbidden, and that all children of slave parents born in the state after its admission should be free at the age of twenty-five, was adopted by the committee and incorporated in the Bill as finally passed (Feb. 17) by the house. The Senate refused to concur in the amendment and the whole measure was lost. During the following session (1819–1820), the house passed a similar bill with an amendment introduced on the 26th of January 1820 by John W. Taylor (1784–1854) of New York making the admission of the state conditional upon its adoption of a constitution prohibiting slavery. In the meantime the question had been complicated by the admission in December of Alabama, a slave state (the number of slave and free states now becoming equal), and by the passage through the house (Jan. 3, 1820) of a bill to admit Maine, a free state. The Senate decided to connect the two measures, and passed a bill for the admission of Maine with an amendment enabling the people of Missouri to form a state constitution. Before the bill was returned to the house a second amendment was adopted on the motion of J. B. Thomas (1777–1850) of Illinois, excluding slavery from the “Louisiana Purchase” north of 36° 30′ (the southern boundary of Missouri), except within the limits of the proposed state of Missouri. The House of Representatives refused to accept this and a conference committee was appointed. There was now a controversy between the two houses not only

  1. Thus liberating about 114,000 blacks, of a tax valuation of $40,000,000.
  2. The Liberals were those who thought unjust the proscriptionary legislation passed against the Secessionists and Democrats; and to this issue of local politics were added the issues of national reform which the course of President Grant’s administration had forced upon his party. A convention of Liberals that met at Jefferson City in January 1872 issued to all Republicans favourable to reform within the party an invitation to meet at Cincinnati in May; and this was the convention of revolters against General Grant that nominated Horace Greeley of New York and B. Gratz Brown of Missouri as Liberal Republican candidates for the presidency and vice-presidency respectively. The first definite organization of the Liberal Republican party may therefore be said to have been made in Missouri in 1870.
  3. From 1820–1844 the elections were in August and inaugurations in November; Governor King served from the 27th of December 1848 till January 1853; thereafter the inauguration was in January, and beginning with 1864 the election was in November. The term was four years except under the constitution of 1865.