probably enough in his lordships own possession,] which, as they seem to correspond ["Seems! I know not seems"] with the notions then entertained of the whimsical appearances, of this fantastic spirit, and perhaps were copied in the dresses in which he was formerly exhibited on the stage, are, to gratify the curious [with an imposture] engraven below." Nothing, surely was ever more ridiculous and contemptible; we know by these extracts how "he was formerly exhibited upon the stage," and that it was not like a Seale-bay gallant or hairy savage; and moreover, that these blocks, manifestly engraved for Bulwers work, in which are many others of the same kind, were calculated merely to give an idea of some barbarous nations in foreign parts, and could not, possibly, have the most slight or distant allusion to the English stage. How, therefore, durst this learned but pertinacious prelate, (as, whatever he was when he first published his book, he is now, when he has given a new edition with alterations and additions,) affirm that "all confidence [had] been destroyed" by the inadvertent transposition of two syllables, and the omission of a note of interrogation; and that only in the preface to a book, in which the passage occurs, accu-
