Page:Finch Group report.pdf/138

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

138


Annex G: Bibliography

Bennett, L (2012) The potential effect of making journals free after a six month embargo, ALSPS and the Publishers Association

Birrell, D et al, (2009) Online Catalogue and Repository Interoperability Study (OCRIS),

Bjork, B-C et al, (2010) ‘Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009’, PLoSOne, 5(6)

Boshoff, N (2009), “South–South research collaboration of countries in the Southern Development Community (SADC)” Scientometrics 84(2) pp. 481–50

Brand, A (2012) ‘Beyond Mandate and Repository, toward sustainable faculty selfarchiving’, Learned Publishing, 25(1)

Centro ASK, Università Bocconi, (2011) PEER Economics Report

Cox, J et al (2010) Payment Methods for Online Journals Agreement: Models for redistribution of costs

Dallmeier--Tiessen,S et al (2010) First results of the SOAP Project: Open Access Publishing in 2010

David Willetts (2012), Public Access to Publicly-Funded Research, Speech to the Publishers Association, 2 May

Davis, P, (2011) ‘Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing’, FASEB Journal, 25, pp 2129-2134

Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (2011), Innovation and Research Strategy for Growth Cm8329

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2011) SET Statistics 2011

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2011) BIS Economics Paper No. 15, Innovation and Research Strategy for Growth,

Elsevier (2011), International Comparative Performance of the UK Research Base 2011:report for the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills,

Erway, R (2012) Lasting Impact: Sustainability of Disciplinary Repositories, OCLC

Fang Wu et al (2007), ‘Novelty and Collective Attention’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105, 17599

Gonçalves, B.,et al (2011) ’ Modeling users' activity on twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number’, PLoSOne, vol 6 (8),

Hargreaves, I (2011), Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, Intellectual Property Office

Hall, S (2010): A commentary on ‘The economic implications of alternative publishing models’, Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 28:1, 73-84

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2011) Peer review in scientific publications, HC 856,

Houghton, J et al (2009) Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits, JISC

Laakso et al, (2011),‘The development of OA journal publishing 1993-2009’, PLoS ONE 6(6)

McDonald, D et al (2012)The Value and Benefits of Text Mining, JISC Research Information Network (2006) Public Access to Digital Content, RIN

Mark Ware Consulting Ltd (2009), Access by UK small and medium-sized enterprises to professional and academic information, Publishing Research Consortium