Page:Footsteps of Dr. Johnson.djvu/94

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
64
INTRODUCTION.

men of letters, yet they never for one moment forgot their pride in their own country. In a famous club they had banded themselves together for the sake of doing away with a reproach which had been cast upon their nation. Just as down to the present time no Parliament has ventured to trust Ireland with a single regiment of volunteers, so Scotland one hundred years ago was not trusted with a militia. In the words of Burns,

"Her lost militia fired her bluid."[1]

In 1759 a Bill for establishing this force had been brought into Parliament, and though Pitt acquiesced in the measure, it was thrown out by "the young Whigs." Most Englishmen probably felt with Horace Walpole, when he rejoiced that "the disaffected in Scotland could not obtain this mode of having their arms restored."[2] Two or three years later the literary men in Edinburgh, affronted by this refusal, formed themselves into a league of patriots. The name of The Militia Club, which they had at first thought of adopting, was rejected as too directly offensive. With a happy allusion to the part which they were to play in stirring up the fire and spirit of the country, they decided on calling themselves "The Poker." Andrew Crosbie, the original of Mr. Counsellor Pleydell, was humorously elected Assassin, and David Hume was added as his Assessor, "without whose assent nothing should be done."[3] It was urged with great force that Scotland was as much exposed as England to plunder and invasion. Why, it was asked, was she refused a militia when one had been granted to Cumberland and Westmoreland, and Lancashire? Had not those countries contributed more adventurers to the forces of the Young Pretender than all the Lowlands? "Why put a sword in the hands of foreigners for wounding the Scottish nation and name? A name admired at home for fidelity, regaled [sic] in every clime for strictness of discipline, and dreaded for intrepidity."[4] In 1776 the Bill was a second time brought in, but was a second time rejected. "I am glad," said Johnson, "that the Parliament has had the spirit to throw it out."[5] By this time it was not timidity only which caused the rejection. The English were touched in their pockets. It was

  1. The Author's Earnest Cry and Prayer.
  2. Walpole's Reign of George II., iii. 280.
  3. Dr, Alexander Carlyle's Autobiography. pp. 399, 419.
  4. Andrew Henderson's Consideration on the Scots Militia (ed. 1761), p. 26.
  5. Boswell's Johnson, iii. 1.