Page:Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man.djvu/416

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
CHAP. XX.
THEORY OF PROGRESSION
396

genera) in the upper portions of the same series; and lastly, in the recent appearance of Man on the surface of the earth.'

'This historical development,' continues the same author, 'of the forms and functions of organic life during successive epochs, seems to mark a gradual evolution of creative power, manifested by a gradual ascent towards a higher type of being.' 'But the elevation of the fauna of successive periods was not made by transmutation, but by creative additions; and it is by watching these additions that we get some insight into Nature's true historical progress, and learn that there was a time when Cephalopoda were the highest types of animal life, the primates of this world; that Fishes next took the lead, then Reptiles; and that during the secondary period they were anatomically raised far above any forms of the reptile class now living in the world. Mammals were added next, until Nature became what she now is, by the addition of Man.'[1]

Although in the half century which has elapsed between the time of Lamarck and the publication of the above summary, new discoveries have caused geologists to assign a higher antiquity both to Man and the oldest fossil mammalia, fish, and reptiles than formerly, yet the generalisation, as laid down by the Woodwardian Professor, still holds good in all essential particulars.

The progressive theory was propounded in the following terms by the late Hugh Miller in his 'Footprints of the Creator.'

'It is of itself an extraordinary fact without reference to other considerations, that the order adopted by Cuvier in his "Animal Kingdom," as that in which the four great classes of vertebrate animals, when marshalled according to their rank and standing, naturally range, should be also that in which they occur in order of time. The brain, which bears an

  1. Professor Sedgwick's Discourse on the Studies of the University of Cambridge, Preface to 5th ed. pp. xliv. cliv. ccxvi. 1850.