[b] Rem. 1. Where an adjectival attribute appears to stand before its substantive (according to the usual explanation, for the sake of special emphasis) the relation is really appositional in character; thus, Is 10 עֲנִיָּה עֲנָתוֹת O thou poor one, Anathoth! (but probably עֲנִ֫יהָ answer her, is to be read); cf. 23:12, 53:11 (a righteous man, my servant; but in 28:21 זָר and נָכְרִיּ are predicates preceding the substantives); Jer 3, 10 f., ψ 18 him who is worthy to be praised will I call upon the Lord; 92:12 (apposition after participles).—But רַבִּים and רַבּוֹת many, are sometimes placed, like numerals, before the substantive, Jer 16, Neh 9 (in ψ 145 רַב is a subst. regens, in 89:51 the text is corrupt); an appositional relation can scarcely be intended in these instances.
[c] 2. In a few expressions (mostly poetic) the adjective appears not as an attribute after the substantive, but in the construct state governing it; so in the singular, Ex 15 (unless גֹּדֶל should be read); 1 S 16 (the height of his stature); in the plural, 1 S 17 חַלֻּקֵי אֲבָנִים smooth ones of (among) stones, i.e. smooth stones; Is 35, Ez 7, ψ 46, and with a following collective instead of a plural, e.g. Is 29 אֶבְיוֹנֵי אָדָם the poor among men, i.e. poor men; Jer 49, Zc 11; cf. in Latin canum degeneres. However, in almost all these cases the adjective which is made into a regens is strongly emphatic, and is frequently equivalent to a superlative (see below, § 133 g).
[d] 3. When two adjectives follow a feminine, sometimes only that standing next to the noun takes the feminine termination, e.g. 1 K 19 רוּחַ גְּדֹלָה וְחָזָק וגו׳ (but read גָּדוֹל); 1 S 15 (but cf. § 75 y); Jer 20, ψ 63. A similar dislike of the feminine form may also be observed in the case of verbal predicates referring to feminine subjects, cf. § 145 p and t.
When an attribute qualifies several substantives of different genders, it agrees with the masculine, as being the prior gender (cf. § 146 d), e.g. Neh 9 חֻקִּים וּמִצְוֹת טוֹבִים; Jer 34, Zc 8.
When three attributes follow a substantive, the first two may stand without a conjunction, and the last be attached by wāw copulative, cf. Zc 1.
[e] 4. After feminines plural ending in ־ִים (§ 87 p) the adjectival attribute (in accordance with the fundamental rule stated above, under a) takes the ending וֹת, e.g. Is 10 בֵּיצִים עֲזֻבוֹת forsaken eggs; Gn 32. For a strange exception see Jer 29 (differently in 24:2).
[f] 5. With regard to number it is to be remarked that—
(a) Substantives in the dual are followed by adjectives (or participles) in the plural, e.g. ψ 18 (Pr 6) עֵינַ֫יִם רָמוֹת haughty eyes; Is 35, Jb 4 f., cf. § 88 a.
[g] (b) Collective ideas are not infrequently joined with the plural of the adjective or participle (constructio ad sensum); thus, e.g. צֹאן sheep [with fem. plur.], Gn 30, 1 S 25; עַם=men, 1 S 13, Is 9; כָּל־יִשְׂרָאֵל=all the Israelites, 1 S 2; גָּלוּת=the exiles, Jer 28; cf. also נֶ֫פֶשׁ שְׁנָ֫יִם two souls, Gn 46.[1] Cf. similar phenomena in the connexion of collectives with plural predicates in § 145 c.
[h] (c) The pluralis excellentiae or pluralis maiestatis is joined, as a rule, to the singular of the attribute, e.g. ψ 7 אֱלֹהִים צַדִּיק; 2 K 19, 16 (=Is 37, 17); Is 19; but cf. אֱלֹהִים חֶיִּים[2] Dt 5, 1 S 17, 36, Jer 10, 23, perhaps also
- ↑ But it is impossible to take תְּמִימִם in Ez 46 as an attribute of בָּקָר; probably it is a correction intended to harmonize the passage with Nu 28 where two young bullocks are required.
- ↑ Cf. 1 S 28, where אֱלֹהִים (in the sense of a spirit) is followed by עֹלִים as a second accusative; conversely in 1 S 19, 16, a singular suffix refers back to תְּרָפִים household god (but not so in Gn 31), as in ψ 46 to the plural of amplification יַמִּים sea. On the other hand, it is very doubtful whether רַבָּה ψ 78 is to be regarded as an attribute of תְּהֹמוֹת and not rather as the adverb, abundantly.
