Harvard Law Review.
Published Monthly, during the Academic Year, by Harvard Law Students.
SUBSCRIPTION PRICE, $2.50 PER ANNUM. |
35 CENTS PER NUMBER. |
Editorial Board. | |
|
Editor-in-Chief. |
William H. Cowles, |
Bancroft G. Davis, |
George P. Furber, |
Robert S. Gorham, |
Homer H. Johnson, |
Blewett H. Lee, |
George R. Nutter, |
Joseph N. Palmer, |
Paul C. Ransom, |
Edward T. Sanford, |
Edward I. Smith, |
William Williams, |
Samuel Williston, |
Henry M. Williams, Treasurer. |
The demand for the April number, Vol. I., No. 1, was so great as
to exhaust the edition some time ago. To complete some special volumes,
the editors of the Review are anxious to obtain a few copies of
that number. The Treasurer will make a liberal offer for one or more
copies.
During the month of January, 1888, seventy-five new members have been added to the Harvard Law School Association, representing 19 States and Territories. They are divided as follows: Massachusetts, 31; New York, 11; Ohio, 5; Illinois, 6; Connecticut, 3; New Hampshire, 3; Pennsylvania, 2; Wisconsin, 2; Delaware, Virginia, Arkansas, Vermont, Tennessee, Missouri, Louisiana, Kentucky, Rhode Island, and California, 1 each; and the District of Columbia, 2.
An idea of the amount of legal business in England is given by some statistics in the London “Times.” The list for Hilary term showed a falling off under every head but that of chancery causes, as compared with the same term of the previous year. The number of appeals entered numbered 189, as against 249 the year before. The number of actions in the Queen’s Bench Division, 660, as against 1,052; and the total number of causes and actions entered in the various Divisions amounted to 2,235 for Hilary, 1887, as compared with 2,286 for Hilary, 1886, being a decrease of 51. In the Queen’s Bench Division it is noticeable that the popularity of trials before a judge without a jury goes on increasing. In practically all cases a plaintiff or defendant can claim to have a jury, but it is found that for many classes of cases a judge sitting alone is the best tribunal, and that both parties willingly forego their right to a jury. It is not long ago since the cases for trial with juries were in proportion of two to one. This change in the taste of suitors may fairly be considered as evidence of an increasing faith in the impartiality of the judicial bench.
