Page:Harvard Law Review Volume 5.djvu/418

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
402
HARVARD LAW REVIEW.
402

402 HAR YARD LA W RE VIE W. case, for Mr. Justice Rapallo made the surprising statement that the trustee's contention had never been sanctioned by any decision. Holland v. Alcock was followed in O'Connor v. Gifford 1 and Reed v. Williams. 2 Hence the subsequent failure of the " Tilden Trust." J. B. Ames. 1 wj N. Y. 275. 8 125 N. Y. 560.