64 HISTOKl OF GREECE. In dealing with Grecian mythes generally, it fs convenient tc distribute them into such as belong to the Gods and such a? belong to the Heroes, according as the one or the other are the prominent personages. The former class manifests, more palpa- bly than the latter, their real origin, as growing out of the faith and the feelings, without any necessary basis, either of matter of fact or allegory : moreover, they elucidate more directly the religion of the Greeks, so important an item in their character as a people. But in point of fact, most of the mythes present to us Gods, Heroes and Men, in juxtaposition one with the other and the richness of Grecian mythical literature arises from the infinite diversity of combinations thus opened out ; first by the three class-types, God, Hero, and Man ; next by the strict keep- ing with which each separate class and character is handled. We shall now follow downward the stream of mythical time, which begins with the Gods, to the Heroic legends, or those which principally concern the Heroes and Heroines ; for the latter were to the full as important in legend as the former. CHAPTER II. LEGENDS RELATING TO HEROES AND MEN. THE Hesiodic theogony gives no account of anything like a creation of man, nor does it seem that such an idea was mucli entertained in the legendary vein of Grecian imagination ; which commonly carried back the present men by successive generations to some primitive ancestor, himself sprung from the soil, or from a neighboring river or mountain, or from a god, a nymph, etc. But the poet of the Hesiodic " Wurks and Days " has given us a narrative conceived in a very different spirit respecting the origin of the human race, more in harmony with the sober and melan- choly ethical tone which reigns through that poem. 1
- Hesiod, as cited in the Etymologicon Magnum (probably the Hesiodit
