CONDUCT OF ATHENS. 7 Greeks, and that too without any stipulations in their favor, haa been recounted in my last volume. 1 She had not now the excuse, for it stands only as an excuse and not as a justification of self-defence against aggression from Athens, which Archidamus had produced at the beginning of the war. Even then it was only a colorable excuse, not borne out by the reality of the case ; but now, the avowed as well as the real object was something quite different, not to repel, but to crush, Athens. Yet to ac- complish that object, not even of pretended safety, but of pure ambition, Sparta sacrificed unconditionally the liberty of her Asi- atic kinsmen ; a price which Archidamus at the beginning of the war would certainly never have endured the thoughts of paying, notwithstanding the then formidable power of Athens. Here, too, we find Athens following the example ; and consenting, in hopea of procuring Persian aid, to the like sacrifice, though the bargain was never consummated. It is true that she was then contending for her existence. Nevertheless, the facts afford melancholy proof how much the sentiment of Pan-hellenic independence became enfeebled in both the leaders, amidst the fierce intestine conflict terminated by the battle of .^Egospotami. 3 1 See Vol. IX, Ch. LXXV, p. 360. Compare the expressions of Demosthenes (cont. Aristokrat. c. 33, p. 666) attesting the prevalent indignation among the Athenians of his time, about this surrender of the Asiatic Greeks by Sparta, and his oration De Rho- dior. Libertate, c. 13, p. 199, where he sets the peace of Kallias, made by Athens with Persia in 449 B. c., in contrast with the peace of Antalkidas, contracted under the auspices of Sparta. 2 This is strikingly set forth by Isokrates, Or. xii, (Panathen.) s. 167- 173. In this passage, however, he distributes his blame too equally between Sparta and Athens, whereas the blame belongs of right to the former, in far greater proportion. Sparta not only began the practice of invoking the Great King, and invoking his aid by disgraceful concessions, but she also carried it, at the peace of Antalkidas, to a more extreme point of selfish- ness and subservience. Athens is guilty of following the bad example of her rival, but to a less extent, and under greater excuse on the plea of ne- cessity. Isokrates says in another place of this discourse, respecting tho various acts of wrong-doing towards the general interest of Hellas iirifstnTeov roiif /J.EV fifterepove 6ipi/j.cf& el f avruv yEjEvrifj.ivovc^ AaKEdai/iovi r >ve 6e T& fiev vpuTOVf, T a 6e fiovove, efa^aprovraf (Panath. s. 103). Which is ranch nearer the truth than the passage before referred to.
