On the subject of the theory of cell-formation which he had
borrowed from Sprengel, he endeavoured to extricate himself
from his difficulty by ingeniously pointing out that though
the starch-grains in the seed-leaves of the bean disappear
without producing new cells in them, they are dissolved and
then serve as fluid material for new cell-formation in other
parts of the germinating plant, which however was giving up Sprengel's theory; yet he cited as a direct proof of that theory the origination of gonidia in the cells of Hydrodictyon, and their development into new nets.
Mirbel and his German opponents moved for the most part in a circle of ideas which had been formed by the speculations of Malpighi, Grew, Hedwig and Wolff, though it must be allowed that the observations of Treviranus did open new points of view. But Johann Jalob Paul Moldenhawer[1] travelled far beyond these older views as early as 1812 in his important work, 'Beitrage zur Anatomic der Pflanzen.' He took up from the first a more independent position as regards former opinions than either of the writers hitherto considered. He relied on very detailed, varied, and systematic observations evidently made with a better instrument, abided by what he himself saw, and chose his point of view in accordance with it, while he criticised the views of his predecessors in detail with an unmistakable superiority, and in so doing displayed minute acquaintance with the literature of the subject and varied phytotomical experience. He fixed his eye firmly on the points in question, and made each one the subject of earnest investigation and copious and perspicuous discussion. His figures prove the carefulness of his examination and the greater excellence of his instrument; they are undoubtedly the best that were produced up to 1812. His mode of dealing with his subject and his figures, though they were not executed by
- ↑ Johann Jakob Paul Moldenhawer was Professor of Botany in Kiel; he was born at Hamburg in 1/66, and died in 1827.
