nutrition in plants with Saussure's results. Agricultural
chemists were chiefly engaged till nearly 1860 with the
questions, whether all or certain constituents of the ash of
a plant are indispensable parts of its food, and whence these
constituents are derived, and with cognate considerations on
the exhaustion of the soil by cultivation and its remedy by
suitable manuring. In France Boussingault had undertaken
experimental and analytical investigations on these subjects
before 1840, and it was he who in the course of the next
twenty years made the most valuable physiological discoveries;
of these the most important was the fact that plants do not
make use of free atmospheric nitrogen as food, but take up
compounds of nitrogen for the purpose. In Germany the
interest in such questions was increased by the instrumentality of Justus Liebig, who gathered from the knowledge that had been accumulated up to 1840 all that was fundamental and
of real importance, and drew attention to the great practical value of the theory of the nutrition of plants in agriculture
and in the management of woods and forests; considerable state
provision was soon made for investigations of the kind, but
these often wandered from the right path for the reason, that
being designed to promote practical interests they lost sight
of the inner connection between all vital phenomena. Still
a great mass of facts was accumulated, which careful sifting
might afterwards render serviceable to pure science. Some
of the best agricultural chemists deserve the credit of vindicating purely scientific as well as practical points of view, and
explained in comprehensive works the general subject of the
nutrition of plants, so far as it was possible to do so without
going deeply into their organisation; among these were Boussingault and the Germans Emil Wolff and Franz Schulze.
But the questions of the nutrition of plants, which are connected with the chemical processes of assimilation and metabolism within them, remained still undecided, though some valuable preliminary work on these points dates from this time.
Page:History of botany (Sachs; Garnsey).djvu/393
Appearance
BOOK III.]
Introduction.
373