where questions of nutrition turned on the movement of the
sap, was the backward condition of the study of the inner
structure of plants, as described in the second book. For
instance, the question of the descending sap was complicated
in the strangest way by Du Petit-Thouars's theory of bud-roots that descend between the bark and the wood; Reichel's unfounded idea of the rising of the sap in the tubes of the wood was generally accepted, and a still worse error was maintained by some, that the intercellular spaces of the parenchyma are
true sap-conveying organs. In 1812 Moldenhawer had to in-
sist, but without producing any general conviction, that the
vessels of the wood contain air, and Treviranus in 1821 that
the stomata serve for the entrance and exit of air. We need
not notice here what nature-philosophers like Kieser said about nutrition and the movement of the sap; but even those who were far from adopting the extravagancies of this school were incapable of either making use of or carrying on the labours of Ingen-Houss, Senebier, and de Saussure. We may adduce in proof of this statement the remarks of Link on the function of leaves in his 'Grundlehren der Anatomic und Physiologic,' 1807. He says at p. 202 that their function is according to Hales
transpiration, according to Bonnet absorption, according to
Bjerkander the exudation and secretion of a variety of fluids, according to Hedwig the storing up of juices, and inasmuch as
leaves increase the green surfaces of plants, bear stomata and hairs, and hold a quantity of juices in their abundant parenchyma, we may ascribe all these functions, but none of them exclusively, to leaves; the only thing peculiar to them is that they convey elaborated juices to the young parts. Their great work, the decomposition of carbon dioxide, he does not mention. But this neglect of the doctrines of Ingen-Houss, Senebier, and de Saussure was common, especially in Germany: it is seen in the efforts made to prove once more the existence of a descending sap in the rind, just as it had been proved in the two previous centuries, by the result of removing a ring of bark
Page:History of botany (Sachs; Garnsey).djvu/525
Appearance
Chap. ii.]
of Plants. De Saussure.
505