Page:Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia.pdf/1

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KIEFEL CJ,

BELL, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ



JENNIFER HOCKING
APPELLANT

AND

DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT

Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia
[2020] HCA 19
Date of Hearing: 4 & 5 February 2020
Date of Judgment: 29 May 2020
S262/2019

ORDER

1. Appeal allowed.

2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 8 February 2019 and, in their place, order that:

(a) the appeal to the Full Court be allowed;
(b) the orders of Griffiths J made on 16 March 2018 be set aside and, in their place, it be:
(i) declared that the contents of Record AA1984/609 ("the deposited correspondence") constitute Commonwealth records within the meaning of the Archives Act 1983 (Cth);
(ii) ordered that a writ of mandamus issue to compel the Director-General of the National Archives of Australia to reconsider Professor Hocking's request for access to the deposited correspondence; and